This chapter examines how neuropsychology can be used to evaluate the validity and consistency of witness testimony and memory recall, as well as the cognitive processes and vulnerabilities that may affect eyewitness evidence in court. Readers are given a thorough understanding of the impact on memory retrieval, sensitivity to suggestion, and possible legal procedure ramifications through a thorough review of research findings and case studies. The neurological foundations of memory development and retrieval are examined in this chapter, along with the impact of stress, trauma, and post-event information on eyewitness recall. In order to improve the accuracy of witness evidence, it also examines the strategies and tactics utilized in neuropsychological evaluations of eyewitness recall, such as lineup procedures and cognitive interviews. Case studies emphasize cases of misidentification and unjust convictions to highlight the practical consequences of memory-related issues in influencing judicial results. A deeper comprehension of the intricacies surrounding memory recall and witness testimony in legal settings is one of the main lessons learned, as is the significance of integrating neuropsychological insights into investigative techniques and legal proceedings to prevent injustices.