The research paper compares sustainable development strategies in Bhutan and India from the conservation point of view. Bhutan is unique because it introduced the Gross National Happiness (GNH) concept and adopted conservation policies and activities that factor in general well-being and environmental conservation. Due to its heterogeneous socioeconomic environment, India faces a peculiar challenge in harmonizing its conservation efforts with rapid economic growth and industrial development. This paper evaluates the successes and challenges the two countries face through a detailed review of conservation strategies, socioeconomic context, cultural impact, and governance structure. The most important sectors in which it evaluates the two countries are community involvement, environmental impact assessment, policy implementation, and conserving threatened species and habitats. The research evaluates the experiences of both countries so that lessons can be learned and potential areas of cooperation can be identified, along with suggestions for policy improvement. This comparative study would help to understand the intricate association between conservation and sustainable development and how environmental concerns may be integrated into the national developmental agenda.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Development in Bhutan Himalaya and India Himalaya, from a Conservation Perspective

  • Tej Kumar Nepal,
  • Sourajit Ghosh

摘要

The research paper compares sustainable development strategies in Bhutan and India from the conservation point of view. Bhutan is unique because it introduced the Gross National Happiness (GNH) concept and adopted conservation policies and activities that factor in general well-being and environmental conservation. Due to its heterogeneous socioeconomic environment, India faces a peculiar challenge in harmonizing its conservation efforts with rapid economic growth and industrial development. This paper evaluates the successes and challenges the two countries face through a detailed review of conservation strategies, socioeconomic context, cultural impact, and governance structure. The most important sectors in which it evaluates the two countries are community involvement, environmental impact assessment, policy implementation, and conserving threatened species and habitats. The research evaluates the experiences of both countries so that lessons can be learned and potential areas of cooperation can be identified, along with suggestions for policy improvement. This comparative study would help to understand the intricate association between conservation and sustainable development and how environmental concerns may be integrated into the national developmental agenda.