Traditional validation strategies are usually not appropriate or feasible for a criminal history screening process. In this chapter, we discuss the development and use of the “risk analysis process,” a refinement to the typical content validity approach. The risk analysis process has five main steps: (1) determining the jobs for which the criminal history screen will be used; (2) identifying the areas of exposure (e.g., finances, drugs, people); (3) developing a list of crimes; (4) linking the crime list to areas of exposure; and (5) determining the exclusionary period. After a thorough discussion of these five steps, the chapter concludes with some thoughts on the Green factors considered by the courts in determining the legality of an organization’s criminal history policies.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Validating a Criminal History Screening Process

  • Michael G. Aamodt,
  • Eric M. Dunleavy

摘要

Traditional validation strategies are usually not appropriate or feasible for a criminal history screening process. In this chapter, we discuss the development and use of the “risk analysis process,” a refinement to the typical content validity approach. The risk analysis process has five main steps: (1) determining the jobs for which the criminal history screen will be used; (2) identifying the areas of exposure (e.g., finances, drugs, people); (3) developing a list of crimes; (4) linking the crime list to areas of exposure; and (5) determining the exclusionary period. After a thorough discussion of these five steps, the chapter concludes with some thoughts on the Green factors considered by the courts in determining the legality of an organization’s criminal history policies.