Scholarlink

In recent years, a series of social and political crises has sparked social movements across Europe. Solidarity emerged as a central concept in these movements, driving their reimagination and transformation. Building on Agustin and Jørgensen’s typology of autonomous, civic, and institutional solidarity, this chapter examines the degrees of institutionalisation in these transformative processes. The chapter presents an extended typology of social movements (SM) and social movement organisations (SMO) in the fields of housing and migrant rights. This typology encompasses five SM and SMO located in Copenhagen, Aarhus, and Aalborg, with two housing and three migrant rights movements. The theoretical analysis considers the interrelational nature of these fields within the broader context of care. A total of 25 documents produced by these movements were analysed—like public statements, calls to action, self-representations, antagonistic statements, press releases, and media representations. The chapter sheds light on the prognosis, diagnosis, and affectual frames of each SM and SMO. The interrelationships of the movements are demonstrated, with the state identified as a main problem actor within both fields. Against this backdrop, the chapter explores how the (re)framing of solidarities through SM and SMO during times of crises can foster new forms of collective political subjectivation.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From the Ghettos to the Camps: Interrelational Solidarity between Housing and Migration Regimes in Denmark

  • 章节

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Franz Bernhardt,
  • Mashudu Salifu,
  • Paola Buconjic,
  • Martin Bak Jørgensen

摘要

In recent years, a series of social and political crises has sparked social movements across Europe. Solidarity emerged as a central concept in these movements, driving their reimagination and transformation. Building on Agustin and Jørgensen’s typology of autonomous, civic, and institutional solidarity, this chapter examines the degrees of institutionalisation in these transformative processes. The chapter presents an extended typology of social movements (SM) and social movement organisations (SMO) in the fields of housing and migrant rights. This typology encompasses five SM and SMO located in Copenhagen, Aarhus, and Aalborg, with two housing and three migrant rights movements. The theoretical analysis considers the interrelational nature of these fields within the broader context of care. A total of 25 documents produced by these movements were analysed—like public statements, calls to action, self-representations, antagonistic statements, press releases, and media representations. The chapter sheds light on the prognosis, diagnosis, and affectual frames of each SM and SMO. The interrelationships of the movements are demonstrated, with the state identified as a main problem actor within both fields. Against this backdrop, the chapter explores how the (re)framing of solidarities through SM and SMO during times of crises can foster new forms of collective political subjectivation.