The effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly relies on the quality of the prompts they receive. However, even when processing identical prompts, LLMs can yield varying outcomes due to differences in their training processes. To leverage the collective intelligence of multiple LLMs and enhance their performance, this study investigates three majority voting strategies for text classification, focusing on phishing URL detection. The strategies are: 1) a prompt-based ensemble, which utilizes majority voting across the responses generated by a single LLM to various prompts; 2) a model-based ensemble, which entails aggregating responses from multiple LLMs to a single prompt; and 3) a hybrid ensemble, which combines the two methods by sending different prompts to multiple LLMs and then aggregating their responses. Our analysis shows that ensemble strategies are most suited in cases where individual components-whether prompts or LLMs-exhibit equivalent performance levels. However, when there is a significant discrepancy in individual performances, the effectiveness of the ensemble method may not exceed that of the highest-performing single component. In such instances, opting for ensemble techniques is not recommended.