In this study, numerical simulationsNumerical simulation of a crucible furnaceCrucible-furnace used for the preheating of a metallurgical ladleMetallurgical-ladle were conducted. Two case studies were simulated: Case A was used to validate a benchmark model, in which the current operating conditions of the system were recreated. In this case, the furnace was considered to operate with a fuel–air ratio of 12:1. For Case B, the simulation was conducted for a fuel–air ratio of 10:1. The same methodology was applied for both cases. Case A was validated through experimental measurements using K-type thermocouples over 50 s. The difference between the computed and experimentally measured temperature shows a minimum relative error of 0.19% and a maximum of 4.9%. Additionally, an improvement in the operation of the crucible furnaceCrucible-furnace was observed for case B, in which a 10% higher temperatureTemperature within the same time frame was achieved.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative Study Between Actual Conditions and Proposed Operating Conditions for a Floor Furnace Used in the Heating of a Metallurgical Ladle Through Numerical Simulation

  • B. Alvarado-López,
  • M. U. Calderón-Rojas,
  • J. Á. Ramos-Banderas,
  • C. A. Hernández-Bocanegra,
  • A. Beltrán,
  • N. M. López-Granados

摘要

In this study, numerical simulationsNumerical simulation of a crucible furnaceCrucible-furnace used for the preheating of a metallurgical ladleMetallurgical-ladle were conducted. Two case studies were simulated: Case A was used to validate a benchmark model, in which the current operating conditions of the system were recreated. In this case, the furnace was considered to operate with a fuel–air ratio of 12:1. For Case B, the simulation was conducted for a fuel–air ratio of 10:1. The same methodology was applied for both cases. Case A was validated through experimental measurements using K-type thermocouples over 50 s. The difference between the computed and experimentally measured temperature shows a minimum relative error of 0.19% and a maximum of 4.9%. Additionally, an improvement in the operation of the crucible furnaceCrucible-furnace was observed for case B, in which a 10% higher temperatureTemperature within the same time frame was achieved.