Following earlier work by Paul Cantor and Stephen Cox on the cultural implications of economic ideas (Literature and the Economics of Liberty, 2009), this essay develops a new theory of comedy, supported by the economic principle of marginal utility. A review of previous theories—the Sudden Glory Theory of Thomas Hobbes (1651), the Seriousness Theory of Elder Olson (1968, intended to supplant all earlier theories), and the ubiquitous Incongruity Theory—demonstrates that they explain only a restricted band of comic effects. The principle of marginal utility, which incorporates the idea of individual and subjective valuation, helps to elaborate a more inclusive theory of how, when, and why the comic response occurs. The essay tests its explanations against a wide range of comic effects, including “dark humor,” self-directed humor, laughter in the face of death, and other phenomena that have not been at home in earlier theories.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Why Do You Think That’s Funny? The Theory of Comedy and the Theory of Valuation

  • Stephen Cox

摘要

Following earlier work by Paul Cantor and Stephen Cox on the cultural implications of economic ideas (Literature and the Economics of Liberty, 2009), this essay develops a new theory of comedy, supported by the economic principle of marginal utility. A review of previous theories—the Sudden Glory Theory of Thomas Hobbes (1651), the Seriousness Theory of Elder Olson (1968, intended to supplant all earlier theories), and the ubiquitous Incongruity Theory—demonstrates that they explain only a restricted band of comic effects. The principle of marginal utility, which incorporates the idea of individual and subjective valuation, helps to elaborate a more inclusive theory of how, when, and why the comic response occurs. The essay tests its explanations against a wide range of comic effects, including “dark humor,” self-directed humor, laughter in the face of death, and other phenomena that have not been at home in earlier theories.