This chapter proposes a peacebuilding approach to the management of herder-farmer conflicts in Africa. Specifically, the chapter reflects on the contending perspectives on peacebuilding, notably the neoliberal and popular progressive arguments. It also emphasizes the pertinence of environmental peacebuilding as a critical component of the latter. Finally, the chapter highlights other salient components of progressive peacebuilding that are critical to the sustainable resolution of herder-farmer conflicts in Africa. These include the gender and human rights dimensions of peacebuilding, the role of subnational and local peacebuilding initiatives/institutions, and the pivotal position of both formal and informal actors in the peace process. Other salient theoretical issues engaged in the chapter include the overlap and cohabitation in the same space, between a number of peacebuilding institutions and processes, most notably national and local institutions, as well as formal and informal, oftentimes in competitive rather than collaborative ways. This connects to the question of hybridity or synergy and autonomy of these institutions in peacebuilding; and how overlaps across various social forces affect the dynamics of conflicts and peacebuilding.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Peacebuilding Perspectives and Herder-Farmer Conflicts in Africa

  • J. Shola Omotola

摘要

This chapter proposes a peacebuilding approach to the management of herder-farmer conflicts in Africa. Specifically, the chapter reflects on the contending perspectives on peacebuilding, notably the neoliberal and popular progressive arguments. It also emphasizes the pertinence of environmental peacebuilding as a critical component of the latter. Finally, the chapter highlights other salient components of progressive peacebuilding that are critical to the sustainable resolution of herder-farmer conflicts in Africa. These include the gender and human rights dimensions of peacebuilding, the role of subnational and local peacebuilding initiatives/institutions, and the pivotal position of both formal and informal actors in the peace process. Other salient theoretical issues engaged in the chapter include the overlap and cohabitation in the same space, between a number of peacebuilding institutions and processes, most notably national and local institutions, as well as formal and informal, oftentimes in competitive rather than collaborative ways. This connects to the question of hybridity or synergy and autonomy of these institutions in peacebuilding; and how overlaps across various social forces affect the dynamics of conflicts and peacebuilding.