Scholarlink

AI is a game changer with impact for developed and emerging countries. Unlike any other technology, it generates a constant reflection on risks to be addressed and the need for AI governance. Numerous documents have emerged to discuss AI governance, AI strategy, and regulation. This study analyzes six of them, chosen to balance between the Global South and Global North perspectives, as well as state, regional and intergovernmental representations: (1) the European Union AI Act; (2) India National Strategy for AI and Responsible AI; (3) Rwanda National AI Policy; (4) Senegal AI National Strategy and Roadmap on AI; (5) the UN Governing AI for Humanity Report; and (6) the US Executive Order on Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI. We summarized the initiators, objectives, sectors of focus, and governance aspects of each document. We used systematic review and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze the documents. They convey a neutral sentiment and are rather objective. Priority sectors for adoption are healthcare, education, and agriculture. The US has differentiated itself with a focus on cyberdefense and developing its semiconductor AI powered industry. Each state and institution has specific priorities but also common ones such as data, compute, and talent. The AI governance strategies of the UN, US, India, Senegal, and Rwanda focus on international cooperation, regulatory frameworks, ethical AI use, and fostering innovation and economic growth.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

AI Strategies: A Review of Selected National and Intergovernmental Approaches

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Christelle Scharff,
  • Om Gaikhe,
  • Julia Tretyakov,
  • Nishit Kishorbhai Shah,
  • Emma Scharff

摘要

AI is a game changer with impact for developed and emerging countries. Unlike any other technology, it generates a constant reflection on risks to be addressed and the need for AI governance. Numerous documents have emerged to discuss AI governance, AI strategy, and regulation. This study analyzes six of them, chosen to balance between the Global South and Global North perspectives, as well as state, regional and intergovernmental representations: (1) the European Union AI Act; (2) India National Strategy for AI and Responsible AI; (3) Rwanda National AI Policy; (4) Senegal AI National Strategy and Roadmap on AI; (5) the UN Governing AI for Humanity Report; and (6) the US Executive Order on Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI. We summarized the initiators, objectives, sectors of focus, and governance aspects of each document. We used systematic review and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze the documents. They convey a neutral sentiment and are rather objective. Priority sectors for adoption are healthcare, education, and agriculture. The US has differentiated itself with a focus on cyberdefense and developing its semiconductor AI powered industry. Each state and institution has specific priorities but also common ones such as data, compute, and talent. The AI governance strategies of the UN, US, India, Senegal, and Rwanda focus on international cooperation, regulatory frameworks, ethical AI use, and fostering innovation and economic growth.