Scholarlink

The effectiveness of non-judicial remedies for business-related human rights abuses can be measured based on the criteria established under UN Guiding Principle 31 which requires them to be legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, rights-compatible and a source of continuous learning. In this regard, current research has focused on understanding whether the OECD National Contact Points could be seen as effective non-judicial mechanism for victims of corporate abuse. Against this background, this chapter aims to assess the requirements of legitimacy and accessibility as key entry-level points to the system of NCPs. Moreover, particular attention will be given to the case of Southern European NCPs such as those in Spain and Portugal.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Improving the Effectiveness of Non-Judicial Mechanisms Under the OECD National Contact Points: Issues of Legitimacy and Accessibility

  • 会议论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Laura Íñigo Álvarez

摘要

The effectiveness of non-judicial remedies for business-related human rights abuses can be measured based on the criteria established under UN Guiding Principle 31 which requires them to be legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, rights-compatible and a source of continuous learning. In this regard, current research has focused on understanding whether the OECD National Contact Points could be seen as effective non-judicial mechanism for victims of corporate abuse. Against this background, this chapter aims to assess the requirements of legitimacy and accessibility as key entry-level points to the system of NCPs. Moreover, particular attention will be given to the case of Southern European NCPs such as those in Spain and Portugal.