错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Language as a Tool: An Anthropological Exploration of Discursive Strategies

  • Aref A. Murshed,
  • Alalddin Al-Tarawneh,
  • Mohammed Al-Badawi

摘要

This assessment examines the close relationship between language and systems, examining how language functions as a tool of communication, persuasion and control in the social system. Drawing on the knowledge and ideas of scholars such as Chomsky, Fairclough and Foucault, we explore what it means to analyze how language works from a historical perspective, through specific case studies, and a much more qualitative approach that allows us to draw conclusions and discuss. The introduction explains that a social system must communicate, influence, persuade, and control. This is where the power of language comes into play. The methodology section describes the qualitative descriptive working method and how we are able to draw any conclusions based on the descriptive approach and subsequent discussion. The analytical tools used are derived from linguistic theories emphasizing the complexity of language used as a policy tool. A historical perspective shows how language has been used in different ways. Whether it's nation building, propaganda or language policies that have impacted linguistic minorities. The case studies examine how language functions in certain social systems, describing social language in Catalonia as a struggle for linguistic autonomy, the excellent functioning of social language in the US, and the manipulation of language in authoritarian regimes. The conclusion proposes and synthesizes the findings, highlighting the power of language in any social system, its influence on public opinion, and the reasons why it is used to preserve the social system. Language is a tool, without its power and symbolism, socialism is reduced to seemingly chaotic actors. It is an assessment that draws conclusions based on linguistic theory and reflections on how social language works. This assessment aims to contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between language and socialism and why we need to critically evaluate social language as part of our engagement with a democratic social system.