Borderline personality disorder is characterized by challenges in interpersonal relationships and self-image, impulsivity, and affective instability. Putative neurobiological mechanisms have deepened understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder, yet challenges remain in the provision of effective treatment. Psychotherapy is the first-line treatment for BPD and though a range of evidence-based modalities are supported, rates of nonresponse are approximately 50%. One approach to improving treatment outcomes concerns research at the cross-disciplinary intersection of neurobiology and psychotherapy. A comprehensive overview of psychotherapy studies that have incorporated biological markers will be provided in this chapter, including neuroimaging, genetics, and neuroendocrine studies. Most studies have investigated task-related brain activation, mainly using affective paradigms that have implicated primarily frontotemporal and limbic regions. High between-study heterogeneity and an overall small number of studies, particularly genetics and neuroendocrine studies, preclude firm conclusions. Recent developments in the field and recommendations for future progress will be discussed.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Psychotherapies and Impact on Borderline Personality Disorder and Ensuing Biological Markers: A New Narrative

  • Ely M. Marceau

摘要

Borderline personality disorder is characterized by challenges in interpersonal relationships and self-image, impulsivity, and affective instability. Putative neurobiological mechanisms have deepened understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder, yet challenges remain in the provision of effective treatment. Psychotherapy is the first-line treatment for BPD and though a range of evidence-based modalities are supported, rates of nonresponse are approximately 50%. One approach to improving treatment outcomes concerns research at the cross-disciplinary intersection of neurobiology and psychotherapy. A comprehensive overview of psychotherapy studies that have incorporated biological markers will be provided in this chapter, including neuroimaging, genetics, and neuroendocrine studies. Most studies have investigated task-related brain activation, mainly using affective paradigms that have implicated primarily frontotemporal and limbic regions. High between-study heterogeneity and an overall small number of studies, particularly genetics and neuroendocrine studies, preclude firm conclusions. Recent developments in the field and recommendations for future progress will be discussed.