The article discusses the evolution of Korea’s cultural heritage protection policies, with a particular focus on intangible cultural heritage, spanning from the inception of the Cultural Property Protection Act in 1962 to the recent enactment of the Framework Act on National Heritage in 2023. The shift towards a more comprehensive legal framework aims to align Korea’s standards with international norms, particularly those set forth by UNESCO’s cultural heritage safeguarding policies. The article highlights the challenges stemming from conflicts between domestic laws and UNESCO conventions, as well as the subsequent revisions undertaken by the Cultural Heritage Administration to address these issues. The article underscores the challenges associated with safeguarding community-based intangible cultural heritage. It proposes assigning a central role to expert committees in safeguarding intangible heritage and advocates for reducing direct government intervention in favour of exploring novel avenues for indirect support.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

An Examination of the Developmental Process and Characteristics of the Korean Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection System

  • Hanhee Hahm,
  • Yong Goo Kim

摘要

The article discusses the evolution of Korea’s cultural heritage protection policies, with a particular focus on intangible cultural heritage, spanning from the inception of the Cultural Property Protection Act in 1962 to the recent enactment of the Framework Act on National Heritage in 2023. The shift towards a more comprehensive legal framework aims to align Korea’s standards with international norms, particularly those set forth by UNESCO’s cultural heritage safeguarding policies. The article highlights the challenges stemming from conflicts between domestic laws and UNESCO conventions, as well as the subsequent revisions undertaken by the Cultural Heritage Administration to address these issues. The article underscores the challenges associated with safeguarding community-based intangible cultural heritage. It proposes assigning a central role to expert committees in safeguarding intangible heritage and advocates for reducing direct government intervention in favour of exploring novel avenues for indirect support.