错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

DeepRepViz: Identifying Potential Confounders in Deep Learning Model Predictions

  • Roshan Prakash Rane,
  • JiHoon Kim,
  • Arjun Umesha,
  • Didem Stark,
  • Marc-André Schulz,
  • Kerstin Ritter

摘要

Deep Learning (DL) has emerged as a powerful tool in neuroimaging research. DL models predicting brain pathologies, psychological behaviors, and cognitive traits from neuroimaging data have the potential to discover the neurobiological basis of these phenotypes. However, these models can be biased by spurious imaging artifacts or by the information about age and sex encoded in the neuroimaging data. In this study, we introduce a lightweight and easy-to-use framework called ‘DeepRepViz’ designed to detect such potential confounders in DL model predictions and enhance the transparency of predictive DL models. DeepRepViz comprises two components - an online visualization tool (available at https://deep-rep-viz.vercel.app/ ) and a metric called the ‘Con-score’. The tool enables researchers to visualize the final latent representation of their DL model and qualitatively inspect it for biases. The Con-score, or the ‘concept encoding’ score, quantifies the extent to which potential confounders like sex or age are encoded in the final latent representation and influences the model predictions. We illustrate the rationale of the Con-score formulation using a simulation experiment. Next, we demonstrate the utility of the DeepRepViz framework by applying it to three typical neuroimaging-based prediction tasks (n = 12000). These include (a) distinguishing chronic alcohol users from controls, (b) classifying sex, and (c) predicting the speed of completing a cognitive task known as ‘trail making’. In the DL model predicting chronic alcohol users, DeepRepViz uncovers a strong influence of sex on the predictions (Con-score = 0.35). In the model predicting cognitive task performance, DeepRepViz reveals that age plays a major role (Con-score = 0.3). Thus, the DeepRepViz framework enables neuroimaging researchers to systematically examine their model and identify potential biases, thereby improving the transparency of predictive DL models in neuroimaging studies.