Scholarlink

This paper was written in 1937 by Josef Schächter und Heinrich Melzer—who like Schächter was a student of Schlick and died in the Second World War—; it was almost simultaneously published in Synthese 64 (1985), 359–374, in English and in Zurück zu Schlick. Eine Neubewertung von Werk und Wirkung, ed. by Brian McGuinness, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien 1985, 92–103, in German. Schlick and Melzer describe a physicalism which they claim corresponds to Schlick’s view (and the view of the Vienna Circle in general) and which amounts to saying that “certain correspondences between our experiences and physical events render our science possible and make it a system of propositions that are intersensually and interpersonally testable”.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

On Physicalism

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Esther Heinrich-Ramharter,
  • Friedrich Stadler

摘要

This paper was written in 1937 by Josef Schächter und Heinrich Melzer—who like Schächter was a student of Schlick and died in the Second World War—; it was almost simultaneously published in Synthese 64 (1985), 359–374, in English and in Zurück zu Schlick. Eine Neubewertung von Werk und Wirkung, ed. by Brian McGuinness, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien 1985, 92–103, in German. Schlick and Melzer describe a physicalism which they claim corresponds to Schlick’s view (and the view of the Vienna Circle in general) and which amounts to saying that “certain correspondences between our experiences and physical events render our science possible and make it a system of propositions that are intersensually and interpersonally testable”.