Starting with the idea of the treatment of the law as language (using two distinct categories: violence and translation) and exploring deterritorialization not only as a phenomenon that constitutes the crucial challenges of our time, but above all as a fundamental experience for all times, especially for those who are mobilized by the global era, my intention is to explore aspects of the law that plurality and difference irreversibly bring. Inserting jurisprudentialism as the ideal framework of narrative rationality, attentive to the difference, to the plural forms, we can immerse ourselves in the effort of understanding everything that brings us closer, especially when dealing with the “counterpoint between the violence of rules as criteria and the practical consonance of principles as foundational warrants” (J.M. Aroso Linhares). This article (or talk) engages with today's scenario, to find possible alternatives that enable a decision-making approach in order to promote the encounter, comprehension and consequent understanding (of the many differences) that exist in ethnic communities or groups involved, through a special translator attitude: the use of a translation mask.