Universities Faculty’s Perception of E-learning Tools: Filling the Gaps for Enhanced Effectiveness

Opinions on e-learning are divided. while the majority of faculty members firmly believe that e-learning benefits students, a small minority is adamant that e-learning has no value and shouldn't be adopted by students or used in other teaching contexts. The faculty members that were interviewed ranged in age from 47 to 50. This suggests that the interviewees are nearly identical in age. The research's conclusions make it clear that a person's age does not significantly affect how others perceive them. In essence, the replies were representative of all age groups, with no age group leaning more or less toward any one view. The data gathered from the study indicates a range of opinions, with no specific gender believing that the online learning program will be beneficial or not. Overall, the answers to the questions do not generally follow a pattern that would indicate that a specific gender had a particular viewpoint on the subject of e-learning. Interviews were done with faculty members who had different titles. In contrast, most responses from professors indicated that they preferred the conventional method of instruction. It seems that perception is independent of experience. In certain instances, individuals with comparable or almost comparable life experiences may hold divergent opinions regarding a particular matter. For instance, when asked whether e-learning results in labor fragmentation and inconsistency, a faculty member with 20 years of expertise and an assistant professor with 15 years of experience had radically different opinions. Since this type of task consists of multiple components within a single section of the subject matter, SD means are not necessary for analysis.