A Defense of Reformed Empiricism

I defend Reformed Empiricism against the following objections: (i) that it institutes a veil of perception; (ii) that it fails to secure singular reference in perceptual situations; (iii) that it leads to an erroneous view of science; (iv) that it fails to account for perceptual error and for phenomenology and for rational revision of view; (v) that it is incomplete, that it needs to be supplemented with a theory of truth; (vi) that an argument offered against the propositional given would, if sound, work against it also.