Cissexism (Genderism or Binarism)

The chapter introduces a brief history of trans people and a multiplicity of transgender identities which challenge social categorization theory. Its contribution in expanding our thinking to represent the human diversity in real life is invaluable. Cissexism, transmisia, systemic and internalized SGM oppression are difficult to dismantle due to unconscious and automatic activation of stereotypes and prejudice due to the neurobiology of automaticity. It discusses misunderstanding terms or inappropriate use of terms interferes with developing appropriate action plans for a particular situation. For example, action plans for cissexism involve changing laws, policies, and rules whereas action plans for sexual and gender minority (SGM) discrimination involve asking specific questions with intellectual curiosity and civility to make sure both parties understand the problem correctly before developing the action plans. Gender dysphoria in DSM-5 is critisized for not providing distinction between pathological behaviors and behaviors due to repeated systemic oppression which became internalized oppression. The importance of a holistic approach in diagnosing a client is emphasized especially, when they have been dealing with cissexism and systemic oppression. Multiple identities and their intersectionaly in understanding trans as a whole person is also emphasized. Interwoven relationships among inappropriate thinking, cissexism, and cisgender privilege as barriers to equity and justice for trans are explored. Experiential learning activities are inserted immediately after the relevant concepts for readers to connect their conceptual understanding (intellectual or objective) of SGM to their lived experiences (emotional or personal).