Introduction

In the introductory chapter of this book, a compelling justification is presented for addressing the alarming broadcasting patterns in Pakistan which consistently infringe citizens’ right to privacy with a sheer disregard to constitutional law of the land, societal values, and universal principles backed by international law. The review of Pakistan's media landscape exposes the absence of guiding principles to protect the right to privacy, prompting a comparative analysis with foreign jurisdictions that have established privacy protection principles. While acknowledging flaws in the media regulatory framework, this chapter emphasizes a human rights approach and the need to safeguard constitutional values. It outlines the pros and cons of the comparative law research methodology, highlighting the multifaceted approaches. The chapter aims to establish the usefulness of the comparative law research methodology by outlining its advantages (with few potential drawbacks), particularly emphasizing its value in providing insights where no local laws or legal principles are available. It sets the stage for the subsequent chapters, which will build a case for privacy protection in Pakistan rooted in theoretical considerations, universal legal principles particularly enshrined and enforced under the European jurisdictions. Ultimate aim of the study is to delve deep into comparative perspectives and noteworthy European experiences in order to influence and inspire the formulation of a locally tailored privacy law.