Confusion of the Living with the Made

If logos is considered to be that which takes place in itself, by itself and for itself (cf. Heidegger, Qu’appelle-t-on penser?, Deuxième partie, V; What Is Called Thinking?, Part Two, Lecture V), how can we ignore the difference between the words which originate in/from a masculine natural belonging or a feminine natural belonging? How does such belonging express itself in predication assuming that the logical process allows it to express itself? And how to get a dialogue going between two differently sexually determined subjectivities? Could it be necessary to remove them from their natural belonging, to put them in the neuter, not to say to castrate them, in order that a communication should be possible between them?