In order to describe Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.philosophy in its historical development, in its continuities and discontinuities with other ideas, it is necessary to examine it in reference to the achievements of Kant’s criticalPhilosophycritical` philosophy. A few months after his death, Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.notes in an obituary published in the Franconian State and Scholarly Newspaper (Fränkische Staats- und Gelehrtenzeitung) in May 1804 that Kant, despite dying at the ripe old age of 79, had nonetheless “outlived himself.” The reason for the continuing relevance of Kant’s philosophy lies, for Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.in the fact that Kant forms “the line between two eras of philosophy, one that is forever ended, another for which, in his sage limitation to solely critical aims he prepared the way negatively.” In an age of fractured mind and morality, Kant directed the sciences toward the subject, and in doing so, consolidated them. It is in this, then, that his historic achievement lay, even if he did not go far enough in this endeavor. This assessment of Kant’s critique of reason as a negative preparation by means of a historical break from classical metaphysics is characteristic of Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.view of criticalPhilosophycritical` philosophy in general. Whenever Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.emerges with a new philosophical systemSystem(s)philosophical, he does so through a negative relation to Kant, the “renewer of philosophy,” critically acknowledging his achievements with respect to the subjective turn while pointing out the systematic deficits of his methodology in order to then proceed to develop his own solutions. This is the case for the early Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.of the philosophy of the I, the transcendental philosophyPhilosophytranscendental, and the Naturphilosophie, as much as for the middle and late Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.of the philosophy of freedom, the philosophy of the Ages of the WorldF.W.S.Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog., and the philosophies of mythologyPhilosophyof mythology and of revelation.

Schelling & Kant

章节
发表日期：

2026年

查看全文

Peter Neumann

摘要

In order to describe Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.philosophy in its historical development, in its continuities and discontinuities with other ideas, it is necessary to examine it in reference to the achievements of Kant’s criticalPhilosophycritical` philosophy. A few months after his death, Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.notes in an obituary published in the Franconian State and Scholarly Newspaper (Fränkische Staats- und Gelehrtenzeitung) in May 1804 that Kant, despite dying at the ripe old age of 79, had nonetheless “outlived himself.” The reason for the continuing relevance of Kant’s philosophy lies, for Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.in the fact that Kant forms “the line between two eras of philosophy, one that is forever ended, another for which, in his sage limitation to solely critical aims he prepared the way negatively.” In an age of fractured mind and morality, Kant directed the sciences toward the subject, and in doing so, consolidated them. It is in this, then, that his historic achievement lay, even if he did not go far enough in this endeavor. This assessment of Kant’s critique of reason as a negative preparation by means of a historical break from classical metaphysics is characteristic of Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.view of criticalPhilosophycritical` philosophy in general. Whenever Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.emerges with a new philosophical systemSystem(s)philosophical, he does so through a negative relation to Kant, the “renewer of philosophy,” critically acknowledging his achievements with respect to the subjective turn while pointing out the systematic deficits of his methodology in order to then proceed to develop his own solutions. This is the case for the early Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.of the philosophy of the I, the transcendental philosophyPhilosophytranscendental, and the Naturphilosophie, as much as for the middle and late Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.of the philosophy of freedom, the philosophy of the Ages of the WorldF.W.S.Schelling, F.W.J. (––. 1976-.). Historisch-kritische Ausgabe [SAA]. Ed. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog., and the philosophies of mythologyPhilosophyof mythology and of revelation.