Scholarlink

<p>This book provides a focused socio-historical analysis of the secondary mathematics curriculum, revealing how science and cultural factors influenced the genesis of many core mathematical ideas. The authors explore why certain concepts became foundational and why their original intentions matter. While seemingly epic in scope, the history provided here is more accessible than one might suspect. Much of the curriculum has its genesis in a rather narrow piece of social history and culture: Europe in the 1600s and the Scientific Revolution. Why history? Because intentions matter in mathematics and education, especially when a mandatory curriculum is tied to high-stakes testing. The authors' historical research reveals mathematics as a powerful, utilitarian approach to science, technology, and engineering. By studying the genesis of mathematical knowledge, the authors identify pathways for both practitioners and researchers to redesign curriculum and instruction in secondary and post-secondary STEM education. By discussing how old ideas could become new again, the authors argue that educators can gain deeper insight into the nature of mathematical reasoning and problem-solving, providing clarity on the complex relationship between mathematics, its history, and the future of STEM education.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Connecting History to Secondary School Mathematics

  • 书籍

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • David J. Carrejo,
  • David Dennis,
  • Susan Addington

摘要

This book provides a focused socio-historical analysis of the secondary mathematics curriculum, revealing how science and cultural factors influenced the genesis of many core mathematical ideas. The authors explore why certain concepts became foundational and why their original intentions matter. While seemingly epic in scope, the history provided here is more accessible than one might suspect. Much of the curriculum has its genesis in a rather narrow piece of social history and culture: Europe in the 1600s and the Scientific Revolution. Why history? Because intentions matter in mathematics and education, especially when a mandatory curriculum is tied to high-stakes testing. The authors' historical research reveals mathematics as a powerful, utilitarian approach to science, technology, and engineering. By studying the genesis of mathematical knowledge, the authors identify pathways for both practitioners and researchers to redesign curriculum and instruction in secondary and post-secondary STEM education. By discussing how old ideas could become new again, the authors argue that educators can gain deeper insight into the nature of mathematical reasoning and problem-solving, providing clarity on the complex relationship between mathematics, its history, and the future of STEM education.