错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The relationship between positive airway pressure tolerance and adherence: defining a new metric

  • Sruti Tekumalla,
  • Andrea Plawecki,
  • Thomas Kaffenberger,
  • Rahul Alapati,
  • Karl Doghramji,
  • Maurits Boon,
  • Colin Huntley

摘要

Study Objectives:

Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence rates range from 30% to 60%, yet adherent patients may still express dissatisfaction with treatment. The identification of factors affecting PAP tolerance could provide insight into its impact on adherence.

Methods:

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea presenting for first follow-up visit after newly initiating PAP therapy were given a 10-question PAP tolerance survey encompassing domains of psychosocial perception, practical issues, and side effects, utilizing 10-point visual analog scales. Relationships between adherence data, tolerance scores, and patient variables (demographics, sleep-related factors, comorbidities, usage data) were explored via 2-tailed t tests, multivariable regression analysis, and recursive partitioning regression trees with a significance level of P ≤ .05.

Results:

For 105 patients, tolerance scores were higher in patients considered adherent to therapy (P = .033), as were scores for individual survey questions addressing the ability to fall asleep (P = .013) and sleep through the night (P = .020). Depression positively (P = .006) and insomnia medication use negatively (P = .010) predicted tolerance score. Data-driven tolerance score cutoffs were identified to correlate with PAP adherence, with higher tolerance scores correlating with greater adherence rates.

Conclusions:

PAP tolerance may play an important role in therapy adherence. Tolerance can be statistically defined and categorized based on prior adherence data. Its utility as a predictive tool in assessing future adherence is warranted.

Citation:

Tekumalla S, Plawecki A, Kaffenberger T, et al. The relationship between positive airway pressure tolerance and adherence:defining a new metric.J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1033–1038.