Scholarlink

<p>This paper examines the intersection of ratiocinatio, concinnitas, form/type in architectural theory and practice, focusing on their capacity to reconcile client-specific preferences with logical architectural principles. Drawing from Vitruvius’ De Architectura and Alberti’s De re aedificatoria, it traces the intellectual foundations of architectural logic and rationale, exploring their implications for contemporary design. Through case studies and critical analysis, the research highlights the role of logical frameworks (ratiocinatio, concinnitas, and form/type) in producing coherent, contextually resonant design. The findings underscore the enduring relevance of these classical concepts while advocating for their evolution to accommodate modern demands for adaptability, sustainability, and systemic logic. By situating these principles within a practice of architecture, the paper articulates a vision for architecture that balances individual creativity with collective cultural and functional imperatives.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Study on Ratiocinatio, Concinnitas and their Modern Counterpart The Origin of the Emphasis on Logic and Rationale in Architectural Production

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月30日

查看全文
  • Sun Woo Kim

摘要

This paper examines the intersection of ratiocinatio, concinnitas, form/type in architectural theory and practice, focusing on their capacity to reconcile client-specific preferences with logical architectural principles. Drawing from Vitruvius’ De Architectura and Alberti’s De re aedificatoria, it traces the intellectual foundations of architectural logic and rationale, exploring their implications for contemporary design. Through case studies and critical analysis, the research highlights the role of logical frameworks (ratiocinatio, concinnitas, and form/type) in producing coherent, contextually resonant design. The findings underscore the enduring relevance of these classical concepts while advocating for their evolution to accommodate modern demands for adaptability, sustainability, and systemic logic. By situating these principles within a practice of architecture, the paper articulates a vision for architecture that balances individual creativity with collective cultural and functional imperatives.