Scholarlink

Setting <p>The ongoing drug poisoning crisis continues to cause significant mortality, with a disproportionate number of overdose deaths occurring when individuals use drugs alone. While supervised consumption sites (SCS) have proven effective in reducing overdose fatalities, their impact is limited by geographic, social, and systemic barriers. In response, overdose response technologies have emerged to expand access to life-saving interventions beyond the reach of traditional harm reduction infrastructure.</p> Intervention <p>Overdose response technologies (e.g., National Overdose Response Service (NORS)) and applications (e.g., Lifeguard App, UnityPhilly) offer real-time monitoring during solitary substance use. Hotlines provide peer-operated support and activate emergency responses if a caller becomes unresponsive, while apps use timers and geolocation to trigger automatic emergency services dispatch. Despite promising early outcomes, these services operate in a fragmented policy landscape without formalized regulatory guidance or implementation best practices.</p> Outcomes <p>Preliminary data show that services like NORS have successfully prevented overdose deaths; however, published outcomes for most services remain limited. Key areas of priority for standards include the following: ensuring privacy for service, balancing data usage for quality improvement and research, building capacity to further equity of access to healthcare and harm reduction using the virtual platform, standardizing overdose response, and providing appropriate education around the efficacy of services.</p> Implications <p>To enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of overdose response technologies, a comprehensive policy or standards framework is needed. This includes guidance on data privacy, service equity, public education, capacity-building, and outcome evaluation, laying the groundwork for safer, scalable, and more accessible overdose prevention interventions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Policy recommendations for overdose response hotlines and applications as a harm reduction tool: A commentary

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月19日

查看全文
  • William Rioux,
  • Nathan Rider,
  • Jeremy Weleff,
  • Boogyung Seo,
  • Chelsea Shover,
  • S. Monty Ghosh

摘要

Setting

The ongoing drug poisoning crisis continues to cause significant mortality, with a disproportionate number of overdose deaths occurring when individuals use drugs alone. While supervised consumption sites (SCS) have proven effective in reducing overdose fatalities, their impact is limited by geographic, social, and systemic barriers. In response, overdose response technologies have emerged to expand access to life-saving interventions beyond the reach of traditional harm reduction infrastructure.

Intervention

Overdose response technologies (e.g., National Overdose Response Service (NORS)) and applications (e.g., Lifeguard App, UnityPhilly) offer real-time monitoring during solitary substance use. Hotlines provide peer-operated support and activate emergency responses if a caller becomes unresponsive, while apps use timers and geolocation to trigger automatic emergency services dispatch. Despite promising early outcomes, these services operate in a fragmented policy landscape without formalized regulatory guidance or implementation best practices.

Outcomes

Preliminary data show that services like NORS have successfully prevented overdose deaths; however, published outcomes for most services remain limited. Key areas of priority for standards include the following: ensuring privacy for service, balancing data usage for quality improvement and research, building capacity to further equity of access to healthcare and harm reduction using the virtual platform, standardizing overdose response, and providing appropriate education around the efficacy of services.

Implications

To enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of overdose response technologies, a comprehensive policy or standards framework is needed. This includes guidance on data privacy, service equity, public education, capacity-building, and outcome evaluation, laying the groundwork for safer, scalable, and more accessible overdose prevention interventions.