错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Performance of a Short Version of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12) to Detect Cognitive Impairment

  • M. Manjavong,
  • A. Diaz,
  • M. T. Ashford,
  • A. Aaronson,
  • M. J. Miller,
  • J. M. Kang,
  • S. Mackin,
  • R. Tank,
  • B. Landavazo,
  • D. Truran,
  • S. T. Farias,
  • M. Weiner,
  • Rachel L. Nosheny

摘要

Background

The Everyday Cognition (ECog) 12-item scale, a functional decline measurement, can distinguish dementia from cognitively unimpaired (CU). Limited data compare ECog-12 performance by raters (self vs. informant) and scoring systems (average numeric vs. categorical grouping) to differentiate cognitive statuses.

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of ECog-12 in differentiation cognitive statuses.

Design

A cross-sectional diagnostic test study.

Setting and Participants

Data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study are analyzed. Participants were aged 55–90 years old divided into subgroups based on diagnostic criteria.

Measurements

We evaluated ECog-12 performance across different diagnostic groups, such as CU vs cognitive impairment (CI; mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia), and the association between ECog-12 and CI. This procedure was repeated for self- and partner (informant)-reports. Additionally, types of ECog scores were also assessed, where an average ECog score was calculated (continuous numeric) as well as a categorical grouping (“any occasional declined” or “any consistently declined”) based on item-level responses to ECog questions.

Results

ECog-12 cut-off scores of 1.36 (self-reported) and 1.45 (partner-reported) distinguish CU from CI with AUC 0.7 and 0.78, respectively. Adding a memory-concern question improved self-reported-ECog AUC to 0.79. Self- and partner-reported “consistently-declined” ECog-12 categorical grouping provided AUC 0.69 and 0.78. The study partner reported ECog-12 showed a greater association with CI than self-reported, with odds ratios of 35.45 and 8.79, respectively.

Conclusion

Study partner-reported ECog scores performed better than self-reported ECog-12 in differentiating cognitive statuses, and a higher study partner reported ECog score was a higher prognostic risk for CI. A memory concern question could enhance self-reported ECog-12 performance. This further emphasizes the need to obtain data from study partners for research and clinical practice.