Scholarlink

Background <p>Prehabilitation aims to improve patients’ resilience to surgery and enhance postoperative recovery. Understanding rationales for prehabilitation content may identify opportunities for program optimization. This systematic review provides an overview of rationales, intervention, and outcomes used in prehabilitation studies in oncological populations.</p> Patients and Methods <p>We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 1 March 2024. Comparative prehabilitation studies including patients undergoing oncological surgery were included. Prehabilitation was defined as a preoperative exercise program, alone or combined with other components, with the explicit aim of improving postoperative outcomes. Extracted outcomes included reported rationales, program content, and primary endpoints.</p> Results <p>In total, 140 studies (<i>N</i> = 24,925 patients) were included. Most (<i>N</i> = 125, 89%) reported a rationale for improving physical fitness, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness (<i>N</i> = 97, 69%). Psychological (<i>N</i> = 46, 33%) and metabolic (<i>N</i> = 28, 20%) rationales were reported less frequently. Rationales for specific attributes (e.g., intensity) were rarely described. Exercise was predominantly supervised (<i>N</i> =&#xa0;57, 41%), and of&#xa0;these supervised sessions, most were&#xa0;prescribed three times per week (<i>N</i> =&#xa0;25, 44%). Almost all studies&#xa0;(<i>N</i> = 121, 86%) included anaerobic exercise component&#xa0;at moderate-intensity continuous (<i>N</i> = 39, 32%) or high-intensity interval (<i>N</i> = 34, 28%) mode. Intended duration varied from 1 to 12 weeks. Most reported primary endpoints were surgical outcomes (e.g., complications) (<i>N</i> = 59, 42%), although definitions varied.</p> Conclusions <p>Preoperatively improving physical fitness is a widely used rationale for prehabilitation; however, studies are implicit in rationales for specific program components. Content and duration of prehabilitation showed considerable variation, often determined by feasibility and time to surgery. Prehabilitation studies could benefit from standardized outcomes. Adopting a more mechanistically grounded approach could improve program design and possibly effectiveness.</p> Trial Registration <p>The review was preregistered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42024512892).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Rationales for Prehabilitation Programs in Patients Preparing for Oncologic Surgery: A Systematic Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月9日

查看全文
  • Emine Akdemir,
  • Wim G. Groen,
  • Maike G. Sweegers,
  • Bart C. Bongers,
  • Anne M. May,
  • Martijn M. Stuiver,
  • Wim H. van Harten

摘要

Background

Prehabilitation aims to improve patients’ resilience to surgery and enhance postoperative recovery. Understanding rationales for prehabilitation content may identify opportunities for program optimization. This systematic review provides an overview of rationales, intervention, and outcomes used in prehabilitation studies in oncological populations.

Patients and Methods

We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 1 March 2024. Comparative prehabilitation studies including patients undergoing oncological surgery were included. Prehabilitation was defined as a preoperative exercise program, alone or combined with other components, with the explicit aim of improving postoperative outcomes. Extracted outcomes included reported rationales, program content, and primary endpoints.

Results

In total, 140 studies (N = 24,925 patients) were included. Most (N = 125, 89%) reported a rationale for improving physical fitness, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness (N = 97, 69%). Psychological (N = 46, 33%) and metabolic (N = 28, 20%) rationales were reported less frequently. Rationales for specific attributes (e.g., intensity) were rarely described. Exercise was predominantly supervised (N = 57, 41%), and of these supervised sessions, most were prescribed three times per week (N = 25, 44%). Almost all studies (N = 121, 86%) included anaerobic exercise component at moderate-intensity continuous (N = 39, 32%) or high-intensity interval (N = 34, 28%) mode. Intended duration varied from 1 to 12 weeks. Most reported primary endpoints were surgical outcomes (e.g., complications) (N = 59, 42%), although definitions varied.

Conclusions

Preoperatively improving physical fitness is a widely used rationale for prehabilitation; however, studies are implicit in rationales for specific program components. Content and duration of prehabilitation showed considerable variation, often determined by feasibility and time to surgery. Prehabilitation studies could benefit from standardized outcomes. Adopting a more mechanistically grounded approach could improve program design and possibly effectiveness.

Trial Registration

The review was preregistered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42024512892).