Scholarlink

Background <p>Different techniques for venous resection and reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy are available, each with different advantages and drawbacks.</p> Patients and Methods <p>In this multimedia article, a detailed description of the surgical technique of venous resection with peritoneal (falciform) patch reconstruction is provided, including examples of extended (&gt;&#xa0;5&#xa0;cm) or low (jejunal veins confluence) venous infiltrations, during both open and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.</p> Results <p>Reconstruction with patch is a versatile technique, typically fit for lateral but cranio-caudally prolonged tumor involvements, which unlike segmental resection allows preservation of venous collaterals, where a simple tangential resection would jeopardize oncologic radicality or increase the risk of stenosis. Moreover, maintaining the original venous axis and direction, it avoids the risk of torsion or kinking potentially associated with segmental resection with or without interposition graft.</p> Conclusions <p>The patch reconstruction combines the advantages of both tangential and segmental resection. It can be used for low or extended infiltrations, during open or robotic surgery, preserving venous collaterals without sacrificing radicality, and using prophylactic anticoagulation only.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Technical Aspects of Patch Reconstruction during Open and Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy with Venous Resection: Preserving Venous Axis and Collaterals without Sacrificing Radicality

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月4日

查看全文
  • Umberto Cillo,
  • Giampaolo Perri,
  • Enrico Gringeri,
  • Domenico Bassi,
  • Giovanni Marchegiani

摘要

Background

Different techniques for venous resection and reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy are available, each with different advantages and drawbacks.

Patients and Methods

In this multimedia article, a detailed description of the surgical technique of venous resection with peritoneal (falciform) patch reconstruction is provided, including examples of extended (> 5 cm) or low (jejunal veins confluence) venous infiltrations, during both open and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Results

Reconstruction with patch is a versatile technique, typically fit for lateral but cranio-caudally prolonged tumor involvements, which unlike segmental resection allows preservation of venous collaterals, where a simple tangential resection would jeopardize oncologic radicality or increase the risk of stenosis. Moreover, maintaining the original venous axis and direction, it avoids the risk of torsion or kinking potentially associated with segmental resection with or without interposition graft.

Conclusions

The patch reconstruction combines the advantages of both tangential and segmental resection. It can be used for low or extended infiltrations, during open or robotic surgery, preserving venous collaterals without sacrificing radicality, and using prophylactic anticoagulation only.