Scholarlink

Background <p>Surgeons have focused on obtaining microscopically negative margins and developing perioperative treatment strategies for pancreatic head cancer. However, the clinical significance of resection margin and radiotherapy remains unclear, particularly in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) settings. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of margin status and perioperative radiotherapy.</p> Methods <p>Between 2014 and 2019, the study enrolled 307 patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 97 patients who underwent NAC followed by PD at three tertiary referral hospitals. The margin status was divided into a three-tier system as follows: R0-wide (tumor-free margin, ≥ 1&#xa0;mm), R0-narrow (0&#xa0;mm &lt; margin &lt; 1&#xa0;mm), and R1 (margin&#xa0;= 0&#xa0;mm).</p> Results <p>In the upfront surgery setting, the groups were arranged in descending order of the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as follows: R0-wide (39.1%), R0-narrow (25.6%), and R1 (12.5%). In the NAC setting, the groups also could be arranged in descending order of 5-year OS rates as follows: R0-wide (52.2%), R0-narrow (45.5%), and R1 (8.3%). However, the differences in OS between the R0-wide and R0-narrow groups did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> = 0.587), in contrast to the upfront surgery setting. In the multivariate analyses, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy after surgery was significantly associated with a decreased risk of locoregional recurrence in both treatment settings.</p> Conclusions <p>Obtaining a wide margin could enhance prognosis in upfront surgery settings, and obtaining only a narrow margin could be appropriate in NAC settings. In addition, adjuvant radiotherapy could be considered, particularly for patients with margin involvement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Changing Clinical Meaning of Resection Margin Status According to the Treatment Paradigm and the Potential Role of Perioperative Radiotherapy for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月30日

查看全文
  • Won-Gun Yun,
  • Wooil Kwon,
  • Hee Ju Sohn,
  • Youngmin Han,
  • Yoon Soo Chae,
  • Hye-Sol Jung,
  • Young Jae Cho,
  • Chang-Sup Lim,
  • Yoo-Seok Yoon,
  • Jin-Young Jang

摘要

Background

Surgeons have focused on obtaining microscopically negative margins and developing perioperative treatment strategies for pancreatic head cancer. However, the clinical significance of resection margin and radiotherapy remains unclear, particularly in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) settings. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of margin status and perioperative radiotherapy.

Methods

Between 2014 and 2019, the study enrolled 307 patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 97 patients who underwent NAC followed by PD at three tertiary referral hospitals. The margin status was divided into a three-tier system as follows: R0-wide (tumor-free margin, ≥ 1 mm), R0-narrow (0 mm < margin < 1 mm), and R1 (margin = 0 mm).

Results

In the upfront surgery setting, the groups were arranged in descending order of the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as follows: R0-wide (39.1%), R0-narrow (25.6%), and R1 (12.5%). In the NAC setting, the groups also could be arranged in descending order of 5-year OS rates as follows: R0-wide (52.2%), R0-narrow (45.5%), and R1 (8.3%). However, the differences in OS between the R0-wide and R0-narrow groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.587), in contrast to the upfront surgery setting. In the multivariate analyses, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy after surgery was significantly associated with a decreased risk of locoregional recurrence in both treatment settings.

Conclusions

Obtaining a wide margin could enhance prognosis in upfront surgery settings, and obtaining only a narrow margin could be appropriate in NAC settings. In addition, adjuvant radiotherapy could be considered, particularly for patients with margin involvement.