Background <p>Textbook outcome (TO) has been utilized to assess the quality of surgical care. This study aimed to define TO rates for minimally invasive gastric&#xa0;gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resections in a bi-institutional cohort.</p> Methods <p>Patients with gastric GIST (≤&#xa0;5 cm) who underwent laparoscopic or robotic resection (January 2014 to January 2024) were retrospectively identified from two GIST centers. We excluded patients with concurrent procedures, tumor involvement of adjacent organs, or metastatic disease. To balance perioperative and oncologic outcomes, we defined TO as: R0 resection, no conversion to open surgery, operative time ≤&#xa0;120 min, no perioperative transfusions, no intraoperative complications, no Clavien-Dindo ≥&#xa0;II complications, hospital length of stay (LOS)&#xa0;≤&#xa0;3 days, no 90-day readmission or death, no tumor rupture, and recurrence-free status at 2 years (5% predicted recurrence risk for tumors with a low mitotic index).</p> Results <p>A total of 83 patients&#xa0;were included. TO was achieved&#xa0;in 62.7% of cases (<i>N</i>&#xa0;= 52). Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.0 cm and 86.7% of GIST were modified-NIH low or very low risk (i.e., mitotic index ≤5/mm<sup>2</sup>). Mean operative time was 102.7 ± 49.3 minutes. Mean LOS was 2.3 ± 1.2 days. Among non-TO cases, the most common disqualifying factors were operative time &gt;&#xa0;120 minutes (<i>N</i> = 20, 24.1%) and LOS &gt;&#xa0;3 days (<i>N</i> = 15, 18.1%). There were four 90-day readmissions (4.8%) and one case with staple&#xa0;line bleeding requiring endoscopic clipping. During a mean follow-up of 32.6 ± 24.1 months, 3 patients (3.6%) recurred within 2 years. On&#xa0;multivariable regression analysis, no factors were&#xa0;independently associated with non-TO.</p> Conclusions <p>Minimally invasive gastric GIST resection is well-described. Herein, we propose new TO standards to serve as a measure of short- and long-term outcomes for monitoring institutional performance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Defining Textbook Outcomes for Minimally Invasive Surgical Resection of Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) of the Stomach

  • Graham J. Spurzem,
  • Priyanka S. Jadhav,
  • Taylor Nordan,
  • Chandrajit P. Raut,
  • Santiago Horgan,
  • Jiping Wang,
  • Jason K. Sicklick

摘要

Background

Textbook outcome (TO) has been utilized to assess the quality of surgical care. This study aimed to define TO rates for minimally invasive gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resections in a bi-institutional cohort.

Methods

Patients with gastric GIST (≤ 5 cm) who underwent laparoscopic or robotic resection (January 2014 to January 2024) were retrospectively identified from two GIST centers. We excluded patients with concurrent procedures, tumor involvement of adjacent organs, or metastatic disease. To balance perioperative and oncologic outcomes, we defined TO as: R0 resection, no conversion to open surgery, operative time ≤ 120 min, no perioperative transfusions, no intraoperative complications, no Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complications, hospital length of stay (LOS) ≤ 3 days, no 90-day readmission or death, no tumor rupture, and recurrence-free status at 2 years (5% predicted recurrence risk for tumors with a low mitotic index).

Results

A total of 83 patients were included. TO was achieved in 62.7% of cases (N = 52). Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.0 cm and 86.7% of GIST were modified-NIH low or very low risk (i.e., mitotic index ≤5/mm2). Mean operative time was 102.7 ± 49.3 minutes. Mean LOS was 2.3 ± 1.2 days. Among non-TO cases, the most common disqualifying factors were operative time > 120 minutes (N = 20, 24.1%) and LOS > 3 days (N = 15, 18.1%). There were four 90-day readmissions (4.8%) and one case with staple line bleeding requiring endoscopic clipping. During a mean follow-up of 32.6 ± 24.1 months, 3 patients (3.6%) recurred within 2 years. On multivariable regression analysis, no factors were independently associated with non-TO.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive gastric GIST resection is well-described. Herein, we propose new TO standards to serve as a measure of short- and long-term outcomes for monitoring institutional performance.