Comparison of Prognostic Outcomes Between Repeat Liver Resection and Particle Therapy for Patients with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Particle therapy (PT) as an initial hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment has been reported to be effective; however, its efficacy for the treatment of recurrent HCC remains unclear.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PT compared with repeat liver resection for treating recurrent HCC after initial LR, with a focus on prognostic outcomes.

Between 2005 and 2019, 89 and 49 patients underwent repeat LR and PT for recurrent HCC after initial LR, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using propensity score matching. Treatment-related complications were scored using the National Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and were compared between the repeat LR and PT groups.

In the entire cohort, the 5-year OS was significantly better in the repeat LR group than in the PT group (75% vs. 48%; p = 0.0003), and the 5-year RFS was comparable in both groups (22% vs. 13%; p = 0.088). Propensity score matching created 34 pairs of patients; no significant differences in the 5-year OS (65% vs. 48%; p = 0.310) and RFS (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.271) were observed between the repeat LR and PT groups. The proportion of CTCAE grade ≥3 complications was 8.8% and 5.9% in the repeat LR and PT groups, respectively (p = 0.641).

After initial LR, the prognosis and treatment-related complications in patients with recurrent HCC were comparable between the repeat LR and PT groups in the matched cohort; therefore, PT may remain one of the multidisciplinary treatment options for recurrent HCC.