Background <p>Adoption of improved agricultural technologies is important for increasing agricultural productivity, household income, food security, and reducing poverty. This paper assessed the impact of adopting improved post-harvest technologies and practices on the dietary diversity of smallholder agricultural households in northern Uganda.</p> Methods <p>The study used cross-sectional survey data from 722 smallholder households across nine districts of northern Uganda. These were districts where a donor funded project, Project for the Restoration of Livelihoods in Northern Uganda was implemented. The focus was on post-harvest (harvesting, drying, and storage) technologies and practices promoted under this project. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, as well as, inferential statistics. In the case of inferential statistics, binary probit regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing adoption of each technology, while, propensity score matching technique was used to compare household dietary diversity (HDD) of adopters and non-adopters.</p> Results <p>Results showed that most farmers decided to harvest at the right maturity, while, the use of tarpaulins was the only adopted drying technology. Less than a quarter of farmers had adopted PICS bags, super gunny bags, and polypropylene bags, as storage facilities. Regression results showed that age, gender, and education level of the household head, household labor, size of land owned, land acreage under crop production, access to credit, use of ox-plough, and access to agricultural markets had significant impact on farmer’s decision to adopt the technologies. Average Treatment Effects on the Treated (ATT) for HDD were positive and significant when households knew how to assess maturity, and also used tarpaulin and PICS bags. These findings indicate that these technologies were associated with increased levels of HDD. On the other hand, ATT was negative and significant for households that harvested at the right time, at the right maturity, used super gunny, and used polypropylene bags for storage.</p> Conclusions <p>Findings of the study support the existence of a strong relationship between dietary diversity and the adoption of post-harvest technologies and practices. These findings highlight the need for targeted extension services and technology promotion to improve food security through dietary diversity.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Does uptake of post-harvest handling technologies lead to better household nutrition? Empirical evidence from a project-based intervention in Northern Uganda

  • Finagnon Kevin Fassinou,
  • Daniel M. Okello,
  • Solomon Olum,
  • Cresensia Asekenye,
  • Stephen W. Kalule,
  • Walter Odongo

摘要

Background

Adoption of improved agricultural technologies is important for increasing agricultural productivity, household income, food security, and reducing poverty. This paper assessed the impact of adopting improved post-harvest technologies and practices on the dietary diversity of smallholder agricultural households in northern Uganda.

Methods

The study used cross-sectional survey data from 722 smallholder households across nine districts of northern Uganda. These were districts where a donor funded project, Project for the Restoration of Livelihoods in Northern Uganda was implemented. The focus was on post-harvest (harvesting, drying, and storage) technologies and practices promoted under this project. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, as well as, inferential statistics. In the case of inferential statistics, binary probit regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing adoption of each technology, while, propensity score matching technique was used to compare household dietary diversity (HDD) of adopters and non-adopters.

Results

Results showed that most farmers decided to harvest at the right maturity, while, the use of tarpaulins was the only adopted drying technology. Less than a quarter of farmers had adopted PICS bags, super gunny bags, and polypropylene bags, as storage facilities. Regression results showed that age, gender, and education level of the household head, household labor, size of land owned, land acreage under crop production, access to credit, use of ox-plough, and access to agricultural markets had significant impact on farmer’s decision to adopt the technologies. Average Treatment Effects on the Treated (ATT) for HDD were positive and significant when households knew how to assess maturity, and also used tarpaulin and PICS bags. These findings indicate that these technologies were associated with increased levels of HDD. On the other hand, ATT was negative and significant for households that harvested at the right time, at the right maturity, used super gunny, and used polypropylene bags for storage.

Conclusions

Findings of the study support the existence of a strong relationship between dietary diversity and the adoption of post-harvest technologies and practices. These findings highlight the need for targeted extension services and technology promotion to improve food security through dietary diversity.