<p>Management of non-point-source emissions from pastured livestock is complicated by spatial and temporal distribution of emissions and how they interplay with equally complex landscape typological distributions. Wearable sensing of CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations near the tailhead may enable real-time, spatially-explicit monitoring of manure emissions, if concentrations correlate with defecation and urination events. The objective of this research was to explore the association between measured CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations from wearable sensors placed on the tailhead of horses and the occurrence of defecation and urination events. CO<sub>2</sub> sensors consisted of a TTGO-T-Beam microprocessor equipped with GPS and LoRa radio, soldered to a CJMCU-8128 environmental sensing board capable of measuring temperature, pressure, relative humidity, CO<sub>2</sub> and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC). Tail wraps were placed on 4 stalled horses for a total of 9&#xa0;days. Surveillance videos were collected over the same time frame and viewed to determine the time of defecation and urination occurrence. Data were analyzed visually for coherence, and quantitatively using analysis of variance, random forest regression, support vector machines, and extreme gradient boosting. Because defecation and urination events were in much lower quantity than non-events, random oversampling and undersampling were attempted on the classification approaches to improve accuracy and precision of signaling algorithms. Visual inspection revealed that although defecation and urination events corresponded to CO<sub>2</sub> peaks, there was considerable noise in CO<sub>2</sub> data suggesting that peaks in CO<sub>2</sub> also frequently occur in the absence of defecation and urination events. All classification algorithms showed poor accuracies (0.50 to 0.51), which were only marginally improved by over- (&lt; 0.51) and undersampling (&lt; 0.69). This preliminary assessment revealed considerable noise in sensing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in production settings, which may preclude usefulness in manure sensing.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Open-source carbon dioxide and volatile organic compound sensing and associations with defecation and urination events in horses

  • R. K. Wright,
  • A. Ganino,
  • R. R. White

摘要

Management of non-point-source emissions from pastured livestock is complicated by spatial and temporal distribution of emissions and how they interplay with equally complex landscape typological distributions. Wearable sensing of CO2 concentrations near the tailhead may enable real-time, spatially-explicit monitoring of manure emissions, if concentrations correlate with defecation and urination events. The objective of this research was to explore the association between measured CO2 concentrations from wearable sensors placed on the tailhead of horses and the occurrence of defecation and urination events. CO2 sensors consisted of a TTGO-T-Beam microprocessor equipped with GPS and LoRa radio, soldered to a CJMCU-8128 environmental sensing board capable of measuring temperature, pressure, relative humidity, CO2 and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC). Tail wraps were placed on 4 stalled horses for a total of 9 days. Surveillance videos were collected over the same time frame and viewed to determine the time of defecation and urination occurrence. Data were analyzed visually for coherence, and quantitatively using analysis of variance, random forest regression, support vector machines, and extreme gradient boosting. Because defecation and urination events were in much lower quantity than non-events, random oversampling and undersampling were attempted on the classification approaches to improve accuracy and precision of signaling algorithms. Visual inspection revealed that although defecation and urination events corresponded to CO2 peaks, there was considerable noise in CO2 data suggesting that peaks in CO2 also frequently occur in the absence of defecation and urination events. All classification algorithms showed poor accuracies (0.50 to 0.51), which were only marginally improved by over- (< 0.51) and undersampling (< 0.69). This preliminary assessment revealed considerable noise in sensing CO2 emissions in production settings, which may preclude usefulness in manure sensing.