Scholarlink

<p>The accuracy of existing liquid holdup models is limited to the range of data used in their development. In this study, a dynamic model for predicting liquid holdup in a two-phase gas liquid vertical flow is developed using artificial neural networks and a wider range of actual and synthetic data obtained from Literature. Prior to the model’s development, feature selection was conducted using Matlab’s machine learning algorithms (MRMR, ANOVA, CHI2, Kruskal wallis and ReliefF), to identify the most influential parameters affecting liquid holdup. Although all eight parameters were used in developing the liquid holdup model, the feature-selection results were used to determine the relative importance of each parameter influencing liquid holdup. Feed‑forward ANN models (1–3 hidden layers) were then trained with Levenberg–Marquardt on stratified splits (70/15/15). Regularization (L2) and k‑fold cross‑validation (k = 5) were applied to mitigate overfitting, and performance was evaluated using R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, average relative error (ARE), and the standard deviation of relative error (SDRE). Results from the analysis reveal that single‑hidden‑layer ANN with 15 neurons was more effective than the two and three hidden layer neural architecture, with overall R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.994 and RMSE ≈ 0.051. Across folds, validation performance remained stable. Sensitivity analysis indicates lower superficial gas velocity (Vsg) decreases liquid holdup (H_L) and higher superficial liquid velocity (Vsl) increases liquid hold-up (H_L) within the tested ranges; while pipe diameter and liquid viscosity show positive associations with H_L, consistent with slug hydrodynamics. This study offers a transparent ANN approach for vertical slug holdup within 50–100&#xa0;mm pipes, spanning <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{sg}=0.11\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(13.15\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> m/s and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{sl}=0.02\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2.35\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> m/s ranges, eliminating the need for complex and time-consuming calculations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Predicting slug liquid holdup in a two-phase gas–liquid vertical flow

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月16日

查看全文
  • Nicholas N. Omeh,
  • Ugochukwu I. Duru,
  • Angela N. Nwachukwu,
  • Boniface U. Okonkwo,
  • Chibuzo C. Nwanwe,
  • Princewill M. Ikpeka

摘要

The accuracy of existing liquid holdup models is limited to the range of data used in their development. In this study, a dynamic model for predicting liquid holdup in a two-phase gas liquid vertical flow is developed using artificial neural networks and a wider range of actual and synthetic data obtained from Literature. Prior to the model’s development, feature selection was conducted using Matlab’s machine learning algorithms (MRMR, ANOVA, CHI2, Kruskal wallis and ReliefF), to identify the most influential parameters affecting liquid holdup. Although all eight parameters were used in developing the liquid holdup model, the feature-selection results were used to determine the relative importance of each parameter influencing liquid holdup. Feed‑forward ANN models (1–3 hidden layers) were then trained with Levenberg–Marquardt on stratified splits (70/15/15). Regularization (L2) and k‑fold cross‑validation (k = 5) were applied to mitigate overfitting, and performance was evaluated using R2, RMSE, average relative error (ARE), and the standard deviation of relative error (SDRE). Results from the analysis reveal that single‑hidden‑layer ANN with 15 neurons was more effective than the two and three hidden layer neural architecture, with overall R2 ≈ 0.994 and RMSE ≈ 0.051. Across folds, validation performance remained stable. Sensitivity analysis indicates lower superficial gas velocity (Vsg) decreases liquid holdup (H_L) and higher superficial liquid velocity (Vsl) increases liquid hold-up (H_L) within the tested ranges; while pipe diameter and liquid viscosity show positive associations with H_L, consistent with slug hydrodynamics. This study offers a transparent ANN approach for vertical slug holdup within 50–100 mm pipes, spanning \({V}_{sg}=0.11\) – \(13.15\) m/s and \({V}_{sl}=0.02\) – \(2.35\) m/s ranges, eliminating the need for complex and time-consuming calculations.