Scholarlink

Objective <p>To compare the results of resection for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) by endoscope between cases that have been embolized preoperatively by transarterial approach and cases that have not been embolized regarding recurrence rates, post-operative complication rates, mean operative time, and mean intraoperative blood loss.</p> Data sources <p>According to PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for publications from 2003 till 2023.</p> Patients and methods <p>In this meta-analysis seventeen original articles in English language studying the surgical removal of JNA by endoscope with and without preoperative transarterial embolization were included. Recurrence rate, rates of complications, amount of blood lost during surgery and surgical time were obtained.</p> Results <p>The main findings were that preoperative transarterial embolization (TAE) seemed to offer improvement of outcomes regarding the intraoperative blood loss, surgical time and recurrence rate but higher complication rate compared with non-embolization. JNA recurrence rate in embolized patients was lower than in non-embolized patients (M-H RR = 0.843 (95% CI: 0.403 – 1.765), I<sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.001%, <i>p</i> = 0.651), intraoperative blood loss was less toward embolized group than non-embolized group (SMD = -2.166 (95% CI: -3.745 – -0.586), I<sup>2</sup> = 93.440%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), surgical time was less toward embolized group than non-embolized group (SMD = -1.531 (95% CI: -4.169 – 1.107), I<sup>2</sup> = 93.125%, <i>p</i> = 0.255), the postoperative complication rates were less toward non-embolized group than embolized group (M-H RR = 1.042 (95% CI: 0.367 – 2.958), I<sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.001% <i>p</i> = 0.939).</p> Conclusion <p>Patients had preoperative transarterial embolization had better outcome regarding intraoperative mean blood loss, operative time and recurrence rate but higher postoperative complication rates.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparative study between preoperative embolization and non embolization in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma resection

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月7日

查看全文
  • Tahany Rabie,
  • Mohamed Qamar El-Sharnoby,
  • Jermen Gamal Shokury Wasef,
  • Omar Yassin

摘要

Objective

To compare the results of resection for juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) by endoscope between cases that have been embolized preoperatively by transarterial approach and cases that have not been embolized regarding recurrence rates, post-operative complication rates, mean operative time, and mean intraoperative blood loss.

Data sources

According to PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for publications from 2003 till 2023.

Patients and methods

In this meta-analysis seventeen original articles in English language studying the surgical removal of JNA by endoscope with and without preoperative transarterial embolization were included. Recurrence rate, rates of complications, amount of blood lost during surgery and surgical time were obtained.

Results

The main findings were that preoperative transarterial embolization (TAE) seemed to offer improvement of outcomes regarding the intraoperative blood loss, surgical time and recurrence rate but higher complication rate compared with non-embolization. JNA recurrence rate in embolized patients was lower than in non-embolized patients (M-H RR = 0.843 (95% CI: 0.403 – 1.765), I2 < 0.001%, p = 0.651), intraoperative blood loss was less toward embolized group than non-embolized group (SMD = -2.166 (95% CI: -3.745 – -0.586), I2 = 93.440%, p = 0.007), surgical time was less toward embolized group than non-embolized group (SMD = -1.531 (95% CI: -4.169 – 1.107), I2 = 93.125%, p = 0.255), the postoperative complication rates were less toward non-embolized group than embolized group (M-H RR = 1.042 (95% CI: 0.367 – 2.958), I2 < 0.001% p = 0.939).

Conclusion

Patients had preoperative transarterial embolization had better outcome regarding intraoperative mean blood loss, operative time and recurrence rate but higher postoperative complication rates.