Background <p>The MDMX-p53 and MDM2-p53 interactions are critical regulators of the tumor-suppressive functions of p53, often disrupted in cancers through overexpression of murine double minute X (MDMX) and murine double minute 2 (MDM2).</p> Methods <p>In this study, we designed and computationally evaluated dual inhibitory peptides using RFdiffusion, ProteinMPNN, AlphaFold Multimer, and AlphaFold 3. Electrostatic complementarity, thermal stability, and binding affinity were assessed, followed by 300&#xa0;ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.</p> Results <p>Mb2 and Mb4 (MDMX/2 binder 2 and 4) exhibited improved predicted binding affinity, enhanced electrostatic complementarity, and higher thermal stability relative to p53. Structural modeling and comparative validation confirmed reliable peptide–protein interactions. MD simulations further demonstrated stable trajectories, reduced conformational fluctuations, and persistent binding of Mb2 and Mb4 to both MDMX and MDM2.</p> Conclusions <p>These findings identify Mb2 and Mb4 as promising dual inhibitory peptides with potential for restoring p53 activity. This study provides a computational foundation for future experimental validation and therapeutic development.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

De novo design and evaluation of dual inhibitory peptide binders targeting MDMX-p53 and MDM2-p53 interactions

  • Olanrewaju Ayodeji Durojaye,
  • Sm Faysal Bellah,
  • Henrietta Uzoeto,
  • Somtochukwu Ezechukwu,
  • Amarachukwu Arazu,
  • Judith Nnedimkpa Ajima,
  • Anthonia Ngozi Ngwu,
  • Samuel Cosmas

摘要

Background

The MDMX-p53 and MDM2-p53 interactions are critical regulators of the tumor-suppressive functions of p53, often disrupted in cancers through overexpression of murine double minute X (MDMX) and murine double minute 2 (MDM2).

Methods

In this study, we designed and computationally evaluated dual inhibitory peptides using RFdiffusion, ProteinMPNN, AlphaFold Multimer, and AlphaFold 3. Electrostatic complementarity, thermal stability, and binding affinity were assessed, followed by 300 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.

Results

Mb2 and Mb4 (MDMX/2 binder 2 and 4) exhibited improved predicted binding affinity, enhanced electrostatic complementarity, and higher thermal stability relative to p53. Structural modeling and comparative validation confirmed reliable peptide–protein interactions. MD simulations further demonstrated stable trajectories, reduced conformational fluctuations, and persistent binding of Mb2 and Mb4 to both MDMX and MDM2.

Conclusions

These findings identify Mb2 and Mb4 as promising dual inhibitory peptides with potential for restoring p53 activity. This study provides a computational foundation for future experimental validation and therapeutic development.