错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): a modified Delphi study

  • Stephanie K. Brewer,
  • Catherine M. Corbin,
  • Ana A. Baumann,
  • Shannon Wiltsey Stirman,
  • Janine M. Jones,
  • Michael D. Pullmann,
  • Aaron R. Lyon,
  • Matthew Aalsma,
  • William Aldridge,
  • Patricia Arean,
  • Maya Barnett,
  • Melanie Barwick,
  • Sarah Birken,
  • Jacquie Brown,
  • Eric Bruns,
  • Amber Calloway,
  • Brittany Cooper,
  • Torrey Creed,
  • Doyanne Darnell,
  • Alex Dopp,
  • Cam Escoffery,
  • Kelly Green,
  • Sarah Hunter,
  • Nathaniel Jungbluth,
  • Sarah Kopelovich,
  • Anna Lau,
  • Bryce McLeod,
  • Maria Monroe-DeVita,
  • Julia Moore,
  • Beth Prusaczyk,
  • Rachel Shelton,
  • Cameo Stanick,
  • Michael Williston,
  • Sean Wright,
  • Soo Jeong Youn

摘要

Background

Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources.

Method

MODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability and inclusion (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis.

Results

In Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application.

Discussion

MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective.