Scholarlink

Background and purpose <p>The design and coating of uncemented joint implants impact bone ingrowth and thereby the stability of the implant. This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to compare early migration of two uncemented, similarly shaped femoral stems with either calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite coating.</p> Patients and methods <p>93 patients (102 hips) were randomized to either an intervention calcium phosphate or a conventional hydroxyapatite-coated stem. Migration measurements were performed postoperatively, and at 6&#xa0;weeks, 3, 12&#xa0;months, and 2 and 5&#xa0;years after operation, and analyzed with radiostereometric analysis.</p> Results <p>There were no significant differences in migration between the two stems from postoperative to 5-year follow-up. With 6&#xa0;weeks follow-up as baseline, the calcium phosphate coated stem showed a tendency towards migrating less with a maximum total point motion up to 2&#xa0;years of 0.84&#xa0;mm (0.68 to 1.00 95% CI) compared to the hydroxyapatite-coated stem which migrated 1.25&#xa0;mm (0.99 to 1.52 95% CI) (<i>P</i> = 0.010).</p> Conclusions <p>Our data show that the calcium phosphate-coated stem is a safe implant in terms of ingrowth stability, and with migration patterns comparable to a hydroxyapatite-coated stem.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Early migration patterns of calcium phosphate versus hydroxyapatite-coated stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial using radiostereometric analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月4日

查看全文
  • Emelie S. Kristoffersson,
  • Daniel Wästerlund,
  • Anette Nyberg,
  • Sead Crnalic,
  • Kjell G. Nilsson,
  • Volker Otten

摘要

Background and purpose

The design and coating of uncemented joint implants impact bone ingrowth and thereby the stability of the implant. This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to compare early migration of two uncemented, similarly shaped femoral stems with either calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite coating.

Patients and methods

93 patients (102 hips) were randomized to either an intervention calcium phosphate or a conventional hydroxyapatite-coated stem. Migration measurements were performed postoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 3, 12 months, and 2 and 5 years after operation, and analyzed with radiostereometric analysis.

Results

There were no significant differences in migration between the two stems from postoperative to 5-year follow-up. With 6 weeks follow-up as baseline, the calcium phosphate coated stem showed a tendency towards migrating less with a maximum total point motion up to 2 years of 0.84 mm (0.68 to 1.00 95% CI) compared to the hydroxyapatite-coated stem which migrated 1.25 mm (0.99 to 1.52 95% CI) (P = 0.010).

Conclusions

Our data show that the calcium phosphate-coated stem is a safe implant in terms of ingrowth stability, and with migration patterns comparable to a hydroxyapatite-coated stem.