Scholarlink

Background <p>Live fuel moisture contributes to wildfire spread and reflects plant stress and physiological traits. The anticipated change in live fuel moisture under future conditions is likely non-linear, owing to physiological plant thresholds in water hydraulics. We constructed a mechanistic model of live fuel moisture’s response to water stress to understand the impact of future climate on live fuel moisture. We first gathered data on plant physiology and live fuel moisture for <i>Pinus ponderosa</i> at Bandelier National Monument, NM, USA, and modeled their relationship. We then parameterized a mechanistic plant hydrodynamics model (FATES-HYDRO) to simulate changes in plant stress and a statistical model to simulate the resulting impact on live fuel moisture. We then simulated FATES-HYDRO under future climate anomalies (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5: 2080–2100) to understand the change in plant stress and estimate its impact on live fuel moisture.</p> Results <p>We found that the number of days below crucial thresholds of live fuel moisture (100% and 79%) increased from contemporary levels (&lt; 100%: 72&#xa0;days, &lt; 79%: 1.4&#xa0;days) under SSP2-4.5 (&lt; 100%: 185&#xa0;days, &lt; 79%: 10.2&#xa0;day) and increased exponentially under SSP5-8.5 (&lt; 100%: 215&#xa0;days, &lt; 79%: 65&#xa0;days). We found that gross primary productivity decreased under both future climate scenarios (contemporary: 336&#xa0;g C m<sup>−2</sup>, SSP2-4.5: 203&#xa0;g C m<sup>−2</sup>, SSP5-8.5: 243&#xa0;g C m<sup>−2</sup>); however, spring productivity increased under SSP5-8.5, potentially altering fuel loading. We additionally see a potentially lethal loss of conductivity in hydraulic <i>P. ponderosa</i> under SSP5-8.5.</p> Conclusions <p>The overall increase in plant water stress (as represented by loss of hydraulic conductivity and leaf water potential) and lower live fuel moisture appear to be driven by reduced precipitation during late summer monsoons typical of the region, extending the fire season later in the year. We predict increasing variability in the <i>P. ponderosa</i> wildfire regime under both climate projections driven by changing productivity, rising mortality, and an overall decrease in live fuel moisture.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Ponderosa pine hydraulic stress predicts more extreme wildfire behavior under future conditions in Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月23日

查看全文
  • Zachary Robbins,
  • Westin Guthrie,
  • Adam Killebrew,
  • Luz Salinas,
  • Ashley M. Matheny,
  • Suvan Cabraal,
  • Maria Ulatowski,
  • Laura Trader,
  • Adam Atchley,
  • Rod Linn,
  • Chonggang Xu,
  • Julia Oliveto,
  • L. Turin Dickman

摘要

Background

Live fuel moisture contributes to wildfire spread and reflects plant stress and physiological traits. The anticipated change in live fuel moisture under future conditions is likely non-linear, owing to physiological plant thresholds in water hydraulics. We constructed a mechanistic model of live fuel moisture’s response to water stress to understand the impact of future climate on live fuel moisture. We first gathered data on plant physiology and live fuel moisture for Pinus ponderosa at Bandelier National Monument, NM, USA, and modeled their relationship. We then parameterized a mechanistic plant hydrodynamics model (FATES-HYDRO) to simulate changes in plant stress and a statistical model to simulate the resulting impact on live fuel moisture. We then simulated FATES-HYDRO under future climate anomalies (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5: 2080–2100) to understand the change in plant stress and estimate its impact on live fuel moisture.

Results

We found that the number of days below crucial thresholds of live fuel moisture (100% and 79%) increased from contemporary levels (< 100%: 72 days, < 79%: 1.4 days) under SSP2-4.5 (< 100%: 185 days, < 79%: 10.2 day) and increased exponentially under SSP5-8.5 (< 100%: 215 days, < 79%: 65 days). We found that gross primary productivity decreased under both future climate scenarios (contemporary: 336 g C m−2, SSP2-4.5: 203 g C m−2, SSP5-8.5: 243 g C m−2); however, spring productivity increased under SSP5-8.5, potentially altering fuel loading. We additionally see a potentially lethal loss of conductivity in hydraulic P. ponderosa under SSP5-8.5.

Conclusions

The overall increase in plant water stress (as represented by loss of hydraulic conductivity and leaf water potential) and lower live fuel moisture appear to be driven by reduced precipitation during late summer monsoons typical of the region, extending the fire season later in the year. We predict increasing variability in the P. ponderosa wildfire regime under both climate projections driven by changing productivity, rising mortality, and an overall decrease in live fuel moisture.