Scholarlink

Background <p>The effectiveness of stem cell (SC) therapy for motor recovery in stroke patients remains debated within the scientific community.</p> Aim/Objective <p>This study aims to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic potential of SC administration for motor recovery in stroke.</p> Methods <p>A thorough search was performed on major electronic databases—PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane—until August 15, 2023. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure methodological rigor and relevance.</p> Results <p>The initial search identified a substantial number of studies. After applying the selection criteria, a final set of eligible studies was reviewed. The extracted data covered various outcome measures related to motor recovery in stroke patients.</p> Conclusions <p>Although some studies suggest the potential efficacy of stem cell therapy for motor recovery in stroke patients, the evidence lacks consistency. Future well-designed, robust randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and ethical implications of stem cell therapy for motor recovery in stroke patients.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Role of stem cells on motor function recovery in stroke patients: systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月8日

查看全文
  • Babita Raghuwanshi,
  • Suresh K. Thanneeru,
  • Roshan Chanchalani,
  • Sumit Raj,
  • Pradeep Chouksey,
  • Md Yunus,
  • Amit Agrawal

摘要

Background

The effectiveness of stem cell (SC) therapy for motor recovery in stroke patients remains debated within the scientific community.

Aim/Objective

This study aims to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic potential of SC administration for motor recovery in stroke.

Methods

A thorough search was performed on major electronic databases—PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane—until August 15, 2023. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure methodological rigor and relevance.

Results

The initial search identified a substantial number of studies. After applying the selection criteria, a final set of eligible studies was reviewed. The extracted data covered various outcome measures related to motor recovery in stroke patients.

Conclusions

Although some studies suggest the potential efficacy of stem cell therapy for motor recovery in stroke patients, the evidence lacks consistency. Future well-designed, robust randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and ethical implications of stem cell therapy for motor recovery in stroke patients.