Objective <p>This study evaluates the feasibility of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT)-based coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using ultra-low flow contrast rate while maintaining diagnostic image quality.</p> Materials and methods <p>In this prospective trial, 292 patients underwent CCTA assigned to one of three protocols: ultra-low (1.5–1.8 mL/s) or routine (4.0–5.0 mL/s) contrast injection with PCD-CT, or routine injection with EID-CT. All scans utilized a high-pitch prospective electrocardiogram-triggering acquisition. PCD-CT images were reconstructed at 45 keV (ultra-low) or 60 keV (routine). Objective image quality was quantitatively assessed by measuring vessel attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality parameters (vascular contrast, image noise, artifacts, and vessel clarity) were independently evaluated by two blinded readers using a 4-point Likert scale (1: non-diagnostic; 2: adequate; 3: good; 4: excellent).</p> Results <p>Objective image quality demonstrated comparable attenuation, CNR, and SNR in proximal coronary segments across all groups (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The ultra-low PCD-CT protocol significantly lowers attenuation in the distal LAD (373.20 ± 49.58 HU) compared to routine protocols (PCD-CT: 393.52 ± 49.38 HU; EID-CT: 396.72 ± 47.55 HU; <i>p</i> = 0.01). While distal vessel clarity scores were modestly reduced in distal vessel clarity (ultra-low PCD-CT: 2.91 ± 0.81 <i>versus</i> routine PCD-CT: 3.58 ± 0.50 <i>versus</i> routine EID-CT: 3.54 ± 0.50; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p> Conclusion <p>For patients with difficulty establishing venous access routes, ultra-low contrast agent flow rates in PCD-CT maintain objective image quality comparable to that of standard protocols, with acceptable diagnostic performance despite slight reductions.</p> Relevance statement <p>Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) maintains objective coronary CT angiography image quality comparable to standard protocols even at ultra-low contrast flow rates (1.5–1.8 mL/s), offering a clinically acceptable and safer alternative for patients with challenging venous access.</p> Key Points <p><UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> <p>First validation of ultra-low flow contrast rate CCTA using photon-counting CT (PCD-CT).</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>Ultra-low flow rates maintain objective image quality (CNR/SNR) <i>versus</i> routine protocols.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>PCD-CT enables 50% contrast reduction without diagnostic compromise.</p> </ItemContent> </UnorderedList></p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Feasibility of ultra-low flow rate coronary CT angiography using photon-counting detector CT: a prospective randomized trial

  • Shuangxiang Lin,
  • Cuiliu Liu,
  • Yalan Zhou,
  • Qinlan Chen,
  • Shuyue Wang,
  • Jiaxing Wu,
  • Xinhong Wang,
  • Jianzhong Sun

摘要

Objective

This study evaluates the feasibility of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT)-based coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using ultra-low flow contrast rate while maintaining diagnostic image quality.

Materials and methods

In this prospective trial, 292 patients underwent CCTA assigned to one of three protocols: ultra-low (1.5–1.8 mL/s) or routine (4.0–5.0 mL/s) contrast injection with PCD-CT, or routine injection with EID-CT. All scans utilized a high-pitch prospective electrocardiogram-triggering acquisition. PCD-CT images were reconstructed at 45 keV (ultra-low) or 60 keV (routine). Objective image quality was quantitatively assessed by measuring vessel attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality parameters (vascular contrast, image noise, artifacts, and vessel clarity) were independently evaluated by two blinded readers using a 4-point Likert scale (1: non-diagnostic; 2: adequate; 3: good; 4: excellent).

Results

Objective image quality demonstrated comparable attenuation, CNR, and SNR in proximal coronary segments across all groups (all p > 0.05). The ultra-low PCD-CT protocol significantly lowers attenuation in the distal LAD (373.20 ± 49.58 HU) compared to routine protocols (PCD-CT: 393.52 ± 49.38 HU; EID-CT: 396.72 ± 47.55 HU; p = 0.01). While distal vessel clarity scores were modestly reduced in distal vessel clarity (ultra-low PCD-CT: 2.91 ± 0.81 versus routine PCD-CT: 3.58 ± 0.50 versus routine EID-CT: 3.54 ± 0.50; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

For patients with difficulty establishing venous access routes, ultra-low contrast agent flow rates in PCD-CT maintain objective image quality comparable to that of standard protocols, with acceptable diagnostic performance despite slight reductions.

Relevance statement

Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) maintains objective coronary CT angiography image quality comparable to standard protocols even at ultra-low contrast flow rates (1.5–1.8 mL/s), offering a clinically acceptable and safer alternative for patients with challenging venous access.

Key Points

First validation of ultra-low flow contrast rate CCTA using photon-counting CT (PCD-CT).

Ultra-low flow rates maintain objective image quality (CNR/SNR) versus routine protocols.

PCD-CT enables 50% contrast reduction without diagnostic compromise.

Graphical Abstract