Scholarlink

Background <p>Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a persistent and debilitating condition. Assessing its characteristics and severity accurately is important, but the suitability of existing fatigue instruments for use in stroke populations is uncertain. The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) is a widely used generic measure capturing both mental and physical fatigue, but the dimensionality of the 11-item CFQ is debated. The objective of this study was to examine the best-fitting model for the CFQ and evaluate whether the addition of latent specific factors for the physical and mental items provided meaningful information beyond the latent general fatigue score.</p> Methods <p>We examined three competing measurement model of the CFQ – unidimensional, correlated two-factor (physical and mental fatigue) and a bi-factor model in a sample of 144 individuals at 4 years post-stroke. Furthermore, we investigated how other criterion-related variables correlated with the estimated CFQ factor scores compared with the simple CFQ.</p> Results <p>The bi-factor measurement model had best fit. Partial correlation analyses indicated that a simple overall fatigue score aligns relatively well with the estimated general factor score, as does the physical sum score. This indicates that separate physical and mental sum scores provide no additional value, whereas their estimated latent specific factors contribute more information. Men reported less fatigue, and except for gender most of the demographic variables were not significantly correlated with the CFQ variables.</p> Conclusion <p>Despite best psychometric support for a bi-factor measurement model, a simple overall sum score may be used to assess fatigue severity satisfactorily. While separate physical and mental factors provide noteworthy nuance, their contribution is in practice limited. Future research should consider refining the mental fatigue items if a more precise assessment or a more nuanced clinical applicability of the physical-mental separation following stroke is needed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Measuring fatigue four years after stroke: a bi-factor analysis of the Norwegian Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月21日

查看全文
  • Synne G. Pedersen,
  • Oddgeir Friborg,
  • Audny Anke,
  • Marianne B. Halvorsen,
  • Mari T. Løkholm,
  • Marte Christine Ørbo

摘要

Background

Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a persistent and debilitating condition. Assessing its characteristics and severity accurately is important, but the suitability of existing fatigue instruments for use in stroke populations is uncertain. The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) is a widely used generic measure capturing both mental and physical fatigue, but the dimensionality of the 11-item CFQ is debated. The objective of this study was to examine the best-fitting model for the CFQ and evaluate whether the addition of latent specific factors for the physical and mental items provided meaningful information beyond the latent general fatigue score.

Methods

We examined three competing measurement model of the CFQ – unidimensional, correlated two-factor (physical and mental fatigue) and a bi-factor model in a sample of 144 individuals at 4 years post-stroke. Furthermore, we investigated how other criterion-related variables correlated with the estimated CFQ factor scores compared with the simple CFQ.

Results

The bi-factor measurement model had best fit. Partial correlation analyses indicated that a simple overall fatigue score aligns relatively well with the estimated general factor score, as does the physical sum score. This indicates that separate physical and mental sum scores provide no additional value, whereas their estimated latent specific factors contribute more information. Men reported less fatigue, and except for gender most of the demographic variables were not significantly correlated with the CFQ variables.

Conclusion

Despite best psychometric support for a bi-factor measurement model, a simple overall sum score may be used to assess fatigue severity satisfactorily. While separate physical and mental factors provide noteworthy nuance, their contribution is in practice limited. Future research should consider refining the mental fatigue items if a more precise assessment or a more nuanced clinical applicability of the physical-mental separation following stroke is needed.