Scholarlink

<p>Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a leading driver of long-term morbidity after allogeneic transplantation. This review synthesizes evidence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across organ systems and survivorship domains, appraises psychometrics and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs), and translates measures into routine care. Validated tools—including the Lee Symptom Scale (LSS), FACT-BMT, SF-36, PROMIS, and pediatric instruments—capture symptom burden and function beyond clinician ratings, and studies have demonstrated associations of some measures with survival, failure-free survival, and non-relapse mortality. Concordance between provider-rated and PRO-defined responses is limited, while PRO changes often track clinically meaningful improvement. We propose an implementation framework and two practical tables mapping measures to organ involvement and use-cases. Key barriers include workflow integration, patient burden, and cross-cultural adaptation-gaps that are pronounced in Chinese cohorts. Embedding PROs in trials and survivorship models can sharpen risk stratification, inform shared decisions, and improve patient-centered outcomes in cGVHD.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Patient-reported outcomes in chronic GVHD: instruments, clinical utility, and survivorship integration

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月14日

查看全文
  • Xiaoli Liang,
  • Shiqin Huang,
  • Ruihao Huang,
  • Jia Liu,
  • Fengming Wang,
  • Yao Quan,
  • Lichao Liu,
  • Lingyu Zeng,
  • Yimei Feng,
  • Xiaoqi Wang,
  • Xi Zhang

摘要

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a leading driver of long-term morbidity after allogeneic transplantation. This review synthesizes evidence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across organ systems and survivorship domains, appraises psychometrics and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs), and translates measures into routine care. Validated tools—including the Lee Symptom Scale (LSS), FACT-BMT, SF-36, PROMIS, and pediatric instruments—capture symptom burden and function beyond clinician ratings, and studies have demonstrated associations of some measures with survival, failure-free survival, and non-relapse mortality. Concordance between provider-rated and PRO-defined responses is limited, while PRO changes often track clinically meaningful improvement. We propose an implementation framework and two practical tables mapping measures to organ involvement and use-cases. Key barriers include workflow integration, patient burden, and cross-cultural adaptation-gaps that are pronounced in Chinese cohorts. Embedding PROs in trials and survivorship models can sharpen risk stratification, inform shared decisions, and improve patient-centered outcomes in cGVHD.