Scholarlink

<p>The prevalence of ChatGPT uses in higher education prompted instructors to apply AI ethics to their classroom, which are moral standards of AI uses. Yet, as a primary group of AI users, undergraduates’ perspectives have rarely been explored to help instructors integrate AI ethics into the classroom. Using a mixed-method approach, this study explored 110 undergraduate students’ agreement levels on five AI ethics from a previous study, the factors influencing their agreement levels, and the rationales explaining their choices. The study showed that undergraduate students agreed with “autonomy” most and “justice” least; gender and grade level could predict their agreement levels; moreover, 14 themes were discovered regarding students’ rationales. Its results enlighten instructors to highlight public interests, consider students’ diversity, develop specific guidelines, and facilitate attitudinal changes in the process of applying instructions about AI ethics.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Undergraduate students’ perspectives of generative AI ethics

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月9日

查看全文
  • Tianxiao Yang,
  • Jongpil Cheon,
  • Moon-Heum Cho,
  • Min Huang,
  • Naydu Cusson

摘要

The prevalence of ChatGPT uses in higher education prompted instructors to apply AI ethics to their classroom, which are moral standards of AI uses. Yet, as a primary group of AI users, undergraduates’ perspectives have rarely been explored to help instructors integrate AI ethics into the classroom. Using a mixed-method approach, this study explored 110 undergraduate students’ agreement levels on five AI ethics from a previous study, the factors influencing their agreement levels, and the rationales explaining their choices. The study showed that undergraduate students agreed with “autonomy” most and “justice” least; gender and grade level could predict their agreement levels; moreover, 14 themes were discovered regarding students’ rationales. Its results enlighten instructors to highlight public interests, consider students’ diversity, develop specific guidelines, and facilitate attitudinal changes in the process of applying instructions about AI ethics.