Scholarlink

Background <p>Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly considered for prehospital cardiac arrest management; however, its impact on resuscitation performance remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether integrating an ECPR protocol into prehospital cardiac arrest care affects the quality of resuscitation compared to application of the standard Advanced Life Support (ALS) protocol.</p> Methods <p>A randomized controlled simulation study was conducted at the University Hospital Leuven in Belgium using standardized pre-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios. Participants, who were physicians functioning as part of resuscitation teams, were randomized into intervention and control groups. The study included a pre- and post-intervention phase. In the pre-phase, all participants followed the standard ALS protocol. Only the intervention group received training in the additional ECPR protocol between the phases. In the post-phase, the intervention group combined this protocol with standard ALS, whereas the control group continued with ALS alone. The primary outcome was overall resuscitation quality, which was assessed using the modified Peltonen score. The secondary outcomes included occurrence and timing of critical resuscitation actions.</p> Results <p>A total of 40 physicians participated in the study. Resuscitation quality was not affected by the ECPR protocol; the modified Peltonen score showed no difference in the pre-post change between the groups (0.02, CI: -0.15; 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.83). However, secondary outcomes showed delayed actions related to the identification and management of the presumed cause of cardiac arrest in the intervention group, such as significantly later verbal suggestions to initiate causal treatments including PCI or thrombolysis.</p> Conclusions <p>In this simulation study, combining a prehospital ECPR protocol with standard ALS resulted in resuscitation performance comparable to ALS alone. Nonetheless, the protocol was associated with delayed diagnostic and therapeutic actions concerning the reversible causes of cardiac arrest, highlighting the need for ECPR training that integrates diagnostic and therapeutic vigilance with procedural execution.</p> Trial registration <p>Clinical Trial Center UZ Leuven, S65846 – September 2021.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluating the impact of implementing an ECPR protocol on prehospital resuscitation quality: a randomized controlled simulation study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月9日

查看全文
  • Frederik Marynen,
  • Marco Garcia van Bijsterveld,
  • Kathleen Van Loon,
  • Sander Kempenaers,
  • Simon Buelens,
  • Jorg Roosen,
  • Steffen Fieuws,
  • Iwan C. C. van der Horst,
  • Walther NKA van Mook,
  • Philippe Dewolf

摘要

Background

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly considered for prehospital cardiac arrest management; however, its impact on resuscitation performance remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether integrating an ECPR protocol into prehospital cardiac arrest care affects the quality of resuscitation compared to application of the standard Advanced Life Support (ALS) protocol.

Methods

A randomized controlled simulation study was conducted at the University Hospital Leuven in Belgium using standardized pre-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios. Participants, who were physicians functioning as part of resuscitation teams, were randomized into intervention and control groups. The study included a pre- and post-intervention phase. In the pre-phase, all participants followed the standard ALS protocol. Only the intervention group received training in the additional ECPR protocol between the phases. In the post-phase, the intervention group combined this protocol with standard ALS, whereas the control group continued with ALS alone. The primary outcome was overall resuscitation quality, which was assessed using the modified Peltonen score. The secondary outcomes included occurrence and timing of critical resuscitation actions.

Results

A total of 40 physicians participated in the study. Resuscitation quality was not affected by the ECPR protocol; the modified Peltonen score showed no difference in the pre-post change between the groups (0.02, CI: -0.15; 0.19, p = 0.83). However, secondary outcomes showed delayed actions related to the identification and management of the presumed cause of cardiac arrest in the intervention group, such as significantly later verbal suggestions to initiate causal treatments including PCI or thrombolysis.

Conclusions

In this simulation study, combining a prehospital ECPR protocol with standard ALS resulted in resuscitation performance comparable to ALS alone. Nonetheless, the protocol was associated with delayed diagnostic and therapeutic actions concerning the reversible causes of cardiac arrest, highlighting the need for ECPR training that integrates diagnostic and therapeutic vigilance with procedural execution.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial Center UZ Leuven, S65846 – September 2021.