Scholarlink

Background <p>Extended reality (XR), encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, is increasingly integrated into healthcare simulation-based education and training. While XR offers immersive, scalable, and potentially cost-effective learning environments, evidence of its educational effectiveness and implementation remains fragmented. To address this gap, an Utstein-style consensus meeting was convened to establish an international research agenda that advances the evidence-based integration of XR in healthcare education.</p> Methods <p>The meeting, held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in November 2024, brought together 24 international experts representing diverse disciplines, geographic regions, and simulation expertise. A Delphi-informed pre-meeting survey, based on a targeted review of XR-focused literature, identified key topics across five initial domains. Using an implementation science–informed approach guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework, participants engaged in structured breakout and plenary discussions to explore barriers, facilitators, and research priorities related to XR adoption and sustainability.</p> Results <p>Through consensus deliberation, the original five domains were refined into three overarching themes: (1) uses and adoption of XR, (2) barriers to XR adoption and implementation, and (3) facilitators of XR implementation and sustainability. Each theme comprised multiple subthemes addressing critical issues such as technological definitions, economic and infrastructure needs, human resource and faculty development, usability, educational quality, customization, and ethical considerations. Research questions within each subtheme were classified as descriptive, justificatory, or clarificatory to guide future study design and methodological rigor.</p> Conclusions <p>This Utstein Style meeting represents the first international, consensus-based effort to develop a structured research agenda for XR in healthcare simulation. Informed by implementation science, particularly the NASSS framework, the resulting agenda provides a roadmap for future research, policy, and practice. It emphasizes faculty readiness, institutional investment, and data-driven evaluation as prerequisites for sustainable integration. By addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators, the healthcare simulation community can advance the responsible adoption of XR technologies, enhancing competency, equity, and innovation in health professions education worldwide.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Setting a research agenda for the use of extended reality in healthcare simulation: an Utstein style meeting

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月3日

查看全文
  • Barry Issenberg,
  • Doris Ostergaard,
  • Francisco Matos,
  • Pier Luigi Ingrassia,
  • Kirsty Freeman,
  • Lars Konge,
  • Carla Sa-Couto,
  • Gabriel Reedy,
  • Asmita Acharya,
  • Joana Berger-Estilita,
  • Kristen Brown,
  • Lennox Huang,
  • M. Emin Aksoy,
  • Marc Lazarovici,
  • May Sissel Vadla,
  • Myriam Alami Younsi,
  • Olivia Dow,
  • Peter Dieckmann,
  • Samia Barbar,
  • Scott Crawford,
  • Serena Ricci,
  • Todd P. Chang,
  • Tore Laerdal,
  • Vicki LeBlanc

摘要

Background

Extended reality (XR), encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, is increasingly integrated into healthcare simulation-based education and training. While XR offers immersive, scalable, and potentially cost-effective learning environments, evidence of its educational effectiveness and implementation remains fragmented. To address this gap, an Utstein-style consensus meeting was convened to establish an international research agenda that advances the evidence-based integration of XR in healthcare education.

Methods

The meeting, held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in November 2024, brought together 24 international experts representing diverse disciplines, geographic regions, and simulation expertise. A Delphi-informed pre-meeting survey, based on a targeted review of XR-focused literature, identified key topics across five initial domains. Using an implementation science–informed approach guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework, participants engaged in structured breakout and plenary discussions to explore barriers, facilitators, and research priorities related to XR adoption and sustainability.

Results

Through consensus deliberation, the original five domains were refined into three overarching themes: (1) uses and adoption of XR, (2) barriers to XR adoption and implementation, and (3) facilitators of XR implementation and sustainability. Each theme comprised multiple subthemes addressing critical issues such as technological definitions, economic and infrastructure needs, human resource and faculty development, usability, educational quality, customization, and ethical considerations. Research questions within each subtheme were classified as descriptive, justificatory, or clarificatory to guide future study design and methodological rigor.

Conclusions

This Utstein Style meeting represents the first international, consensus-based effort to develop a structured research agenda for XR in healthcare simulation. Informed by implementation science, particularly the NASSS framework, the resulting agenda provides a roadmap for future research, policy, and practice. It emphasizes faculty readiness, institutional investment, and data-driven evaluation as prerequisites for sustainable integration. By addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators, the healthcare simulation community can advance the responsible adoption of XR technologies, enhancing competency, equity, and innovation in health professions education worldwide.