Scholarlink

Background <p>Intravitreal injection (IVI) is a widely performed ophthalmic procedure with generally low complication rates, but repeated applications are often required due to the short half-life of anti-VEGF agents. Pain management during IVI is critical for patient quality of life and adherence to treatment (Andrade and Carvalho in Arq Bras Oftalmol 2015;78:27–31). Prior studies have suggested that eyelid specula may increase discomfort, while alternative retraction methods could improve patient tolerance.</p> Main body <p>In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 106 patients were assigned to receive IVI either with an eyelid speculum or with cotton-swab–assisted eyelid retraction. Immediately after the procedure, patients rated pain using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Complications were also recorded. The mean VAS pain score was 2.34 ± 1.83 (95% CI: 1.83–2.85) in the speculum group and 1.37 ± 1.58 (95% CI: 0.93–1.80) in the cotton-swab group. The mean difference of 0.97 points was statistically significant (ANOVA, <i>p</i> = 0.0041). The most frequent complication was subconjunctival hemorrhage (9.4%), with no cases of endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, or lens touch.</p> Conclusion <p>Under the conditions of this study, IVI performed without a speculum using cotton-swab eyelid retraction was associated with lower reported pain and comparable complication rates. This technique may enhance patient comfort and treatment adherence, particularly for those requiring multiple injections each year, although further validation is warranted.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of intravitreal injection techniques with and without a speculum using eyelid retraction with a cotton-tipped applicator

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月29日

查看全文
  • Hanny Rui Qi Chen,
  • Gabriel Costa de Andrade,
  • Lucas Kenji Arimori,
  • Fernando Kruglensky Lerner

摘要

Background

Intravitreal injection (IVI) is a widely performed ophthalmic procedure with generally low complication rates, but repeated applications are often required due to the short half-life of anti-VEGF agents. Pain management during IVI is critical for patient quality of life and adherence to treatment (Andrade and Carvalho in Arq Bras Oftalmol 2015;78:27–31). Prior studies have suggested that eyelid specula may increase discomfort, while alternative retraction methods could improve patient tolerance.

Main body

In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 106 patients were assigned to receive IVI either with an eyelid speculum or with cotton-swab–assisted eyelid retraction. Immediately after the procedure, patients rated pain using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Complications were also recorded. The mean VAS pain score was 2.34 ± 1.83 (95% CI: 1.83–2.85) in the speculum group and 1.37 ± 1.58 (95% CI: 0.93–1.80) in the cotton-swab group. The mean difference of 0.97 points was statistically significant (ANOVA, p = 0.0041). The most frequent complication was subconjunctival hemorrhage (9.4%), with no cases of endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, or lens touch.

Conclusion

Under the conditions of this study, IVI performed without a speculum using cotton-swab eyelid retraction was associated with lower reported pain and comparable complication rates. This technique may enhance patient comfort and treatment adherence, particularly for those requiring multiple injections each year, although further validation is warranted.