Background <p>Orthognathic surgery addresses skeletal dysgnathias, enhancing both function and aesthetics. Despite its benefits, potential complications underscore the need for well-trained surgeons. 3D-printed anatomical models, a product of additive manufacturing, aid surgical education, especially for young surgeons lacking on-the-job training. This study focuses on an economically designed 3D-printed simulator for orthognathic surgery training.</p> Results <p>Evaluation from 31 participants of two orthognatic surgery workshops using the 3D-printed simulator highlighted positive assessments for realism (7.16 ± 2.03/10) and usefulness in training for specific procedures. While commended for simulating limited oral cavity movements and providing a realistic general simulation, soft tissue realism (4.51 ± 2.66/10) suggested room for improvement. Notably, the simulator demonstrated outstanding cost-efficiency (€ 181.55), with reusable components.</p> Conclusions <p>The 3D-printed simulator offers a realistic, cost-effective tool for orthognathic surgery training, despite soft tissue realism limitations. The study anticipates further enhancements in 3D-printing technology to address these aspects and advance future iterations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A novel 3D-printed simulator for hands-on training in orthognathic surgery

  • Lukas Benedikt Seifert,
  • Christopher Groepper,
  • Rosa Rohin,
  • Daniel Thiem,
  • Philipp Becker,
  • Florian Markus Thieringer,
  • Robert Alexander Sader

摘要

Background

Orthognathic surgery addresses skeletal dysgnathias, enhancing both function and aesthetics. Despite its benefits, potential complications underscore the need for well-trained surgeons. 3D-printed anatomical models, a product of additive manufacturing, aid surgical education, especially for young surgeons lacking on-the-job training. This study focuses on an economically designed 3D-printed simulator for orthognathic surgery training.

Results

Evaluation from 31 participants of two orthognatic surgery workshops using the 3D-printed simulator highlighted positive assessments for realism (7.16 ± 2.03/10) and usefulness in training for specific procedures. While commended for simulating limited oral cavity movements and providing a realistic general simulation, soft tissue realism (4.51 ± 2.66/10) suggested room for improvement. Notably, the simulator demonstrated outstanding cost-efficiency (€ 181.55), with reusable components.

Conclusions

The 3D-printed simulator offers a realistic, cost-effective tool for orthognathic surgery training, despite soft tissue realism limitations. The study anticipates further enhancements in 3D-printing technology to address these aspects and advance future iterations.