Scholarlink

<p>Family doctors are encouraged to involve patients as equal partners in research and teaching, but examples of how to do this well are still quite rare. Our project, called the Canadian Primary Care Information Network - Learner and Patient partnership (CPIN-LEAP), set out to show what genuine partnership can look like when developing learning tools for family medicine residents.</p><p><?noindent??><b>What we did.</b> Two patient partners sat on the core research team from day one and helped write the successful grant application. Guided by two national engagement frameworks, we invited nine additional patients to co-design the project’s key products. Together, this team created an online learning module that walks residents through six essential communication skills, and they also drafted eye-catching posters and brochures that invite patients to send feedback after a clinic visit.</p><p><?noindent??><b>What worked well.</b> Patient partners said they felt respected, influential, and relevant. Their ideas made the resident module more practical, especially the real-life scenarios and plain-language tips, and ensured that the community posters spoke directly to patients’ concerns. The finished module has already been added to the University of Ottawa’s Department of Family Medicine’s Innovation Portal and clinic participants will be encouraged to display the posters and brochures.</p><p><?noindent??><b>Challenges we faced.</b> Recruiting enough French-speaking partners proved difficult in our predominantly English-speaking city, even after we specifically targeted Francophone community groups and social-media pages. Coordinating meeting times was another hurdle, because many partners juggled work, caregiving, or appointments; we solved this by mixing in-person workshops, short evening videoconferences with flexible email feedback.</p><p><?noindent??><b>Why it matters.</b> Working side by side with patients led to teaching and knowledge translation materials that reflect real-life worries and priorities. The process shows that deep partnership is doable, but only if projects budget for patient time and stay flexible with timelines. This case study illustrates practical processes and lessons learned from patient partner involvement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Empowering patients in family medicine research: a case-study of patient partner involvement in educational and knowledge translation activities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月26日

查看全文
  • Maddie J. Venables,
  • Sarah Dickson,
  • Maryame Ichiba,
  • Ali Arrhaoui,
  • Emilie Lamontagne,
  • Kimberly P. Grattan,
  • Sharon Johnston,
  • William Hogg,
  • Douglas Archibald

摘要

Family doctors are encouraged to involve patients as equal partners in research and teaching, but examples of how to do this well are still quite rare. Our project, called the Canadian Primary Care Information Network - Learner and Patient partnership (CPIN-LEAP), set out to show what genuine partnership can look like when developing learning tools for family medicine residents.

What we did. Two patient partners sat on the core research team from day one and helped write the successful grant application. Guided by two national engagement frameworks, we invited nine additional patients to co-design the project’s key products. Together, this team created an online learning module that walks residents through six essential communication skills, and they also drafted eye-catching posters and brochures that invite patients to send feedback after a clinic visit.

What worked well. Patient partners said they felt respected, influential, and relevant. Their ideas made the resident module more practical, especially the real-life scenarios and plain-language tips, and ensured that the community posters spoke directly to patients’ concerns. The finished module has already been added to the University of Ottawa’s Department of Family Medicine’s Innovation Portal and clinic participants will be encouraged to display the posters and brochures.

Challenges we faced. Recruiting enough French-speaking partners proved difficult in our predominantly English-speaking city, even after we specifically targeted Francophone community groups and social-media pages. Coordinating meeting times was another hurdle, because many partners juggled work, caregiving, or appointments; we solved this by mixing in-person workshops, short evening videoconferences with flexible email feedback.

Why it matters. Working side by side with patients led to teaching and knowledge translation materials that reflect real-life worries and priorities. The process shows that deep partnership is doable, but only if projects budget for patient time and stay flexible with timelines. This case study illustrates practical processes and lessons learned from patient partner involvement.